Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasGator

I understand that. The USSC ruling was the correct one, but I believe it is never a good idea for churches to accept taxpayer funds unless there is a serious compelling need for it.


30 posted on 06/26/2017 10:19:12 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

You are right and it’s exactly why I objected the GWB’s program to have the gubmint partner with church. This is mixing oil with water and if they are wise, churches ought to run from these programs. That said, if they do decide to take advantage, they should be treated like any other nonprofit.


34 posted on 06/26/2017 10:24:05 AM PDT by CityCenter (Words have specific meanings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson