Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
If a religious organization can't pay for their own playground, then they shouldn't have a playground.

That wasn't the issue. The issue is whether the government can treat religious non-profits differently than other non-profits. Doing so was blatantly discriminatory.

If taxpayers don't want money on playground safety, then they and their elected representatives can choose not to spend it on any non=profit and only public schools or public playgrounds.

23 posted on 06/26/2017 9:11:33 AM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Kazan

I agree with you on the law, but my point is presented from the perspective of the church, not the taxpayer.


31 posted on 06/26/2017 10:21:14 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Kazan
It iis the issue.
41 posted on 06/26/2017 10:41:45 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson