The favorable ruling by a three judge panel of the Ninth Circuit was in effect for about two weeks until the Ninth Circuit accepted a petition for re-hearing from the State of California. At that time my Sheriff, and most others in California, resumed their policy of demanding "good cause" beyond just self-defense.
It's my understanding that the sheriff of San Diego County, who did not appeal the favorable ruling, is presently NOT issuing permits for self-defense and I doubt that Peruta has been granted a permit.
Yes you are correct I was mistaken thanks for the correction. I read it 3 times before posting but for some reason I read what you quoted incorrectly. Thanks again for the correction. (I was starting to think maybe the Ninth Circuit might have some sense haha)