To: aMorePerfectUnion
The high court probably believes it has spoken enough on 2nd amendment issues given Heller. I understand its positioni.
4 posted on
06/26/2017 7:21:05 AM PDT by
guido911
(all)
To: guido911
Anche Io, capisco il positioni!
5 posted on
06/26/2017 7:23:39 AM PDT by
ichabod1
(Smoke does not mean fire when someone threw a smoke grenade.)
To: guido911
The position is not clear enough if other courts are still denying us our rights. Very disappointing they didn’t take this case!
9 posted on
06/26/2017 7:29:03 AM PDT by
Twotone
(Truth is hate to those who hate truth.)
To: guido911
Agree. This is not the time.
10 posted on
06/26/2017 7:30:19 AM PDT by
bigbob
(People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
To: guido911
I don’t think it works that way. Every sheriff in the country is now in charge of gun rights interpretation. That’s the way I read it.
12 posted on
06/26/2017 7:31:40 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired US Army chaplain. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory.)
To: guido911
So for the rest of us who are stuck between all the conflicting courts and rulings and the various states who want to enforce one set or the other, what’s the message the SC has sent here? Do as you please?
15 posted on
06/26/2017 7:33:21 AM PDT by
Magnum44
(My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson