I was always told that San Diego was one of the few conservative urban centers in California. Not so much, it seems.
so i n otherwords the SC is allowing a state to violate the second amendment? There ks nothing in the constitution which puts the requirement to ‘show a need’ before one is allowed the right to carry
The high court probably believes it has spoken enough on 2nd amendment issues given Heller. I understand its positioni.
This Ping List is for all things pertaining to the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
Because they know when the majority rule in favor of the 2nd amendment, it would be a difficult precedent to break in the future.
Cowards.
This is a common pattern for SCOTUS on RKBA. Let the Circuits do the dirty work, allow the situation to fester for a decade or two, then opine as Scalia did in Heller, basing a decision on what is “commony done” as the constitutional standard. That’s how unconsitutional infringements become settled law.
Does not bode well for a national reciprocity bill if the Court is not willing to overturn, or even review, lower court decisions that keep control at the state level.
Good. Wait until Kennedy is gone.