Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress is considering a restart of the F-22 Raptor program
Washington Examiner via Business Insider ^ | June 21st, 201 | Travis J. Tritten

Posted on 06/21/2017 3:42:08 PM PDT by Mariner

The Air Force has provided the House a classified report on restarting the F-22 Raptor fighter jet program, congressional staff said Tuesday.

The House Armed Services Committee received the report two days ago, but staff said it was still being reviewed.

House lawmakers ordered the report last year to determine what it would take and how much it might cost to begin producing the high-tech, fifth generation aircraft again.

Congress voted in 2009 to stop purchasing the F-22 stealth fighters after just 187 were made, hundreds less than the Air Force had planned.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Tucker39

Everything Bathhouse Barry could do to weaken, cripple, restrain, sully, degenerate, incite insurrection in, pervert, twist, corrupt or place further in debt, America, he did.

Oh here and there he pretended to do something, just to keep the ruse going. He was, is and always will be, a destroyer of America. Along with his goon squad. Including the criminals Hillary, Bill and Comey.


21 posted on 06/21/2017 4:41:16 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Hebrews 13:2 Do not forget to entertain strangers, for ... some have unwittingly entertained angels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

“Also build a modern version of the A-10 Warthog and give it to the Marines. Use what already works and add updated Technology.”

Umm, Marines won’t take it unless it leaks hydrolic fluid.....


22 posted on 06/21/2017 4:50:03 PM PDT by snoringbear (E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots

23 posted on 06/21/2017 4:51:09 PM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

The real question shouldn’t be F-22 v. F-35 but why we need fighter pilots in the first place. With the state of radars and missiles, I don’t think there will ever be another meaningful dogfight with a US aircraft, aerial combat will be done from standoff range in the future, if at all.

Put the money into drones and figure out how to remove more Americans from the battlefields.


24 posted on 06/21/2017 4:54:19 PM PDT by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
"F-35 and F-22 have completely different missions."

Was working on Okinawa when the F-22s had their 1st Pacific deployment.
It was a blast seeing them mock dog-fight with Kadena's F-15s - turning radius of the Raptor is insane.

25 posted on 06/21/2017 4:55:24 PM PDT by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jz638

“The real question shouldn’t be F-22 v. F-35 but why we need fighter pilots in the first place.”

That’s a mistake that’s been made by SecDefs in the past.

Your drones are awesome until somebody hacks them and uses them to destroy your SAMs and bombers.

Meat in the seat - accept no substitute.


26 posted on 06/21/2017 5:01:13 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs (Truth, in a time of universal deceit, is courage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Phlyer
A further potential issue is that the F-35 software architecture is better than that on the F-22 (time marches on). Changing the software architecture to be more state-of-the-art would be a major task, but might be worthwhile. It depends on how many units they want to build. (See comments above.)

I don't know about that; I recall the F-35 having a bunch of problems with its software — one reason I heard was likely was because they were using C++ instead of Ada (which is common in military and aviation) due to not being able to hire Ada programmers, which is an obvious untruth (either cop-out or lie, I don't know), but when dealing with a project this big, you can afford to train your programmers to use the proper tools, and I've talked with a few Ada programmers who would love to work with it professionally.

There was a study done by [IIRC] IBM some decades ago on the cost of software development and one interesting thing they found was that a 'bug' was an order of magnitude more costly to fix each next step in the process. So, a $1,000,000 bug caught after production would have cost $100,000 to fix in testing, $10,000 in implementation, $1,000 in design, and possibly $100 in analysis. — One of the reasons Ada has a strong presence in military and aeronautics hardware is precisely because it does help catch errors earlier.

There's some interesting comparisons online like this study comparing Ada and C's development costs, this slide from an uploaded set of slides in HTML (the integration time mentioned there is astoundingly good for the scope of the F-22), and this comparison of SPARK (Ada's provable subset) and Rust.

27 posted on 06/21/2017 5:02:33 PM PDT by Edward.Fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39
Cancelled in 2009. That was the bath house traitor’s doing. Why am I not in the least surprise?

There were a good few Republicans in on it as well — I seem to recall McCain being the leader on the charge to kill the project.

28 posted on 06/21/2017 5:06:32 PM PDT by Edward.Fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

At last. Something right.


29 posted on 06/21/2017 5:19:38 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Just don’t let Lockheed build them.

The USA owns all the rights and tooling. Boeing builds great airplanes in St. Louis. Build ‘em there under license.

Lockheed has already effed up enough stuff.


30 posted on 06/21/2017 5:21:30 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lower Deck

License the construction. It was done all the time in the War.


31 posted on 06/21/2017 5:22:20 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

All the A-10s are just about rebuilt. Don’t be silly, the Marines just have to have a “jump jet”. For what reason I simply can’t fathom. I’d think the A-10 could be made carrier capable though?

A new batch of updated F-15E type aircraft would be a capitol idea.


32 posted on 06/21/2017 5:24:28 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jz638

“The real question shouldn’t be F-22 v. F-35 but why we need fighter pilots in the first place.”

This air to air shoot down in Syria is the first we’ve had since 1999?!

The next step in drone technology will be swarming — no manned aircraft will withstand an attack by fifty networked supersonic drones. Manned aircraft will be for peacetime only!


33 posted on 06/21/2017 5:25:44 PM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hulka

Well, the Air Force doesn’t seem to like it. Army?


34 posted on 06/21/2017 5:27:36 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative ( Democracy, two Wolves and one Sheep deciding what's for Dinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Phlyer

New chips and redesign sure as hell woudl not be cheap if Lockheed did it.

Lockheed does not deserve to build any more F-22s. The gubment owns the tooling so someone else can build the airplanes. There is a little plant in St. Louis that does a good job and another one in Wichita.


35 posted on 06/21/2017 5:27:56 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear

Then they should happily take over the entire F-15E fleet!


36 posted on 06/21/2017 5:30:38 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jz638

You might want to run that one by the Syrian pilot who got whacked earlier this week?


37 posted on 06/21/2017 5:31:38 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs
"meat in the seat"

There was also a time when horses and mass formations were needed in warfare. Technology made them an unnecessary burden that didn't win wars. I don't have numbers handy, but for each fighter sortie behind enemy lines, dozens of hours of training are spent, thousands of gallons of jet fuel, and dozens of CSAR personnel, early warning monitors and logistics trail people get placed on watch. Take the meat out of the seat and you save lives and money. Hacking is a lesser risk than shoot down. We have a decade and a half of experience that can be used to win the next war and save American lives, I think we should try to do it.

38 posted on 06/21/2017 5:51:42 PM PDT by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101
"Lockheed has already effed up enough stuff."

They sure have...

The SR-71,

U-2/TR-1

Have Blue

F-117

C-130

C-141

C-5

S-3 Viking

P-3 Orion

F-104 Starfighter

Constellation

L-1011

P-38 Lightning

Blk 60 F-16

Blk 70 F-16

The JASSM

The Javelin anti-tank missile

The MLRS

The LRASM

oh, and lest I forget,

F-22

just to name a few things Lockheed has "effed up".

39 posted on 06/21/2017 5:54:46 PM PDT by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Wow! Is Newt Gingrich back in DC pulling strings for the Cobb County economy? Are we seeing a Karen Handel winner effect already?


40 posted on 06/21/2017 5:59:28 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson