So will the “investigators” of this year old scam come from the DNC?
Elections have no consequences.
Why are Republicans who are in the majority agreeing with Democrats?
AS IF it is NOT "alleged"?
I know this is Newsmax, but this has not, and cannot, be proved.
So, until they have proof they have to call it "alleged."
That is what good journalism used to do.
Let me guess - led my Juan “Lettuce” McStain”?
WHY are we in charge when the Democrats ALWAYS get their own way???? DUMBASSES....Republicans are SLOW-WITTED and SLOW FOOTED!!!
probe this, ya f#ck
WHY are we in charge when the Democrats ALWAYS get their own way???? DUMBASSES....Republicans are SLOW-WITTED and SLOW FOOTED!!!
First, they never come up with nothing. Whenever there is a “special prosecutor” they find something. Remember Scooter Libby?
But here is the big question. In order to Obstruct Justice, there has to be something to obstruct from. What investigation was obstructed? What was being investigated? You cannot obstruct an investigation that was never happening? What court order was not obeyed? What evidence was “wiped” or “lost”?
The idea that you can investigate obstruction of justice for an investigation that never existed is obscene!!!! Before you can call for an obstruction of an investigation, you need to explain what investigation was even being conducted that COULD BE OBSTRUCTED. All we have heard is that Trump was never being investigated.
Maybe someone could clear this up for me.
Trump’s lawyer keeps saying he’s not under investigation. Ok, I get it. A rose by any other name.
Are investigations by the Hill interfering with on going LEO investigations?
Time to burn up Grasslys phone lines. Let the people of his state hear from us.
Grasslys contact info 515-288-1145. Let’s be heard
I wonder if Grassley already has a subpoena for Comey, who previously declined, preferring the more affable Intel committee?
But then I also wonder, what if the JC found wrongdoing with Comey the Weak-kneed director? Not only his own interfering with an election, but obstruction of the current administration’s business. Who at the Justice Dept could prosecute him without conflict? not Sessions, not Rosenstein and certainly not Mueller - or any of the ‘cream of the cream of American lawyers’ that Mueller has reserved for his own team.
This is BULLSCOOT! There’s really nothing to investigate. A glorious waste of time this is.
IF there is to be an investigation then investigate the real criminals of the Obama Administration, and the Deep State entrenched bureaucracy that has accepted leftist tasking as duties of their taxpayer employment.
The bureaucracies are apparently quite overstaffed with leftist featherbedding.
The US Senate. Our very own House of Lords. There’s a reason the 17th Amendment was passed...
Feinstein letter to Grassley: June 9, 2017
One of the reasons this letter is useful is that is specifically circumscribes the starting scope of inquiry. It also names Comey's co-conspirators.
Termination of Comey has zero impact on any investigation, and the insinuation otherwise, by Feinstein, is risible. The Holt interview speaks for itself.
At any rate, let 'em air it, and watch the Senators lie.
Feinstein is playing Grassley and the entire Republican Congress. She said last week that Comey should be investigated if it appears he did something wrong. Everyone cheered her. Now she has a two front investigation into POTUS and Comey-NOTHING. I find it amazing people can’t remember major commentary from a few days ago. Trump is not on solid ground with all the Libs throwing boulders at him.
GOP-e cuckservatives!