[[But the facts of modern science reveal the plasticity and reproductive capacity of non- living dynamic systems at the margins of life.]]
That’s a fancy way of riducling hte past science which hit the impossibility walls head on, by claiming it is ‘antiquated’ and ‘out of touch with new modern findings’ and that the ‘new evidence indicates that nature somehow was able to supernaturally violate upper probaBILITY limits in mathematical realm by beating the odds, chemical realm, thermodynamic realm and biological realm’ it ‘somehow’ was able ignore all those impossibilities and pull off miracles- but we ‘just don’t know how yet’ but ‘the evidence is getting close to solving it’
There are no practical examples of nature violating natural laws to create the impossible, but that’s ok- just claim the old science is antiquated and out of touch with the reality of the ‘new science’- it’s an appeal to the ‘new and improved’ that looks down it’s noses at the old (which incidentally looked at the problems every which way possible and concluded it was mathematically impossible, biologically impossible, chemically impossible etc-) The ‘new science’ doesn’t explain how, it just makes the assertion that it’s been explained already- while providing no concrete examples-
Somehow ‘non living dynamic systems’ (whatever that means-) was able to spring to life and spark eons of natural law violating processes that resulted in Einstein and Donald Trump