Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

[(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion]

I’d say it’s right there.


37 posted on 06/14/2017 8:32:08 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Hebrews 13:2 Do not forget to entertain strangers, for ... some have unwittingly entertained angels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: SaveFerris
 photo sheep666aa_zpsn0mq7kct.jpg
38 posted on 06/14/2017 8:33:48 PM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: SaveFerris
It is. Except the predicate is action, and what is in the photo is advocacy for domestic terrorism. I'm not defending that, of course, just pointing out the difference between "doing" and "advocating."

I'm also not saying it's protected by the 1st amendment, it might be incitement.

The question is whether or not there is a way to prosecute members for a terrorism-related offense. I'd keep the book open, keep an eye on material support, and maybe one day Antifa will perpetrate an act of domestic terrorism.

40 posted on 06/14/2017 8:37:37 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson