Trump moves to accept hundreds of refugees from Iran under Obama deal(from Australia)

Washington Times ^ | June 12, 2017 | Stephen Dinan

[sickoflibs]

President Trump is preparing to accept hundreds of refugees from Iran and other terrorist-connected countries, taking them from camps being maintained by Australia under a deal his predecessor struck, without putting them through the long vetting that usually takes place, according to a new report being released Monday. Some of the refugees have tried to cleanse their social media presence to try to delete red flags that could cost them their chance to come to the U.S., the Center for Immigration Studies report concludes.

A staggering 88 percent of the refugees have some level of mental illness or disorder, according to a U.N. health inspection last year. And the center’s report documents incidents of rape and sexual assault perpetrated by the refugees on locals.

Australia has been looking for a landing place for the refugees for years, and President Obama agreed to take them. Mr. Trump criticized the “dumb” deal in February, and shared a testy phone call with Australia’s prime minister, but has since relented and is moving quickly to welcome the refugees.

[Ingtar]

Put them in a camp in a rich, liberal area.

[Vaduz]

Until it happens I wouldn’t be so sure remember it’s media release any word from WH about it?.

[onedoug]

By the FBI? That’s encouraging.

(Do I really need a sarc tag?)

[Velveeta]

ping

[Bratch]

Here's the actual report, including footnotes, from the Center for Immigration Studies.

U.S.-Australia Refugee Resettlement Deal Is Underway: Did Trump conclude it wasn't such a "dumb deal" after all?

[Dawgreg]

Why would President Trump do that? He’s been burning the midnight oil trying to UN-do everything Obammy did. Doesn’t make any sense to me.

[Luircin]

I repeat. Oh look, the cucks are still pouting over the primaries.

[CJ Wolf]

I think that’s why we bombed syria. Obama’s red line.

[LucyT]

President Trump is preparing to accept hundreds of refugees from Iran and other terrorist-connected countries, taking them from camps being maintained by Australia under a deal his predecessor struck, without putting them through the long vetting that usually takes place, according to a new report being released Monday.

Some of the refugees have tried to cleanse their social media presence to try to delete red flags that could cost them their chance to come to the U.S., the Center for Immigration Studies report concludes.

A staggering 88 percent of the refugees have some level of mental illness or disorder, according to a U.N. health inspection last year. And the center’s report documents incidents of rape and sexual assault perpetrated by the refugees on locals.

Australia has been looking for a landing place for the refugees for years, and President Obama agreed to take them. Mr. Trump criticized the “dumb” deal in February, and shared a testy phone call with Australia’s prime minister, but has since relented and is moving quickly to welcome the refugees.

Thanks, Velveeta.

[Colonel Kangaroo]

While I am of in favor of invoices immigration, Iranians are generally productive and law-abiding people. I would much rather have them as neighbors than people from most other Middle East and South Asian locales.

[Colonel Kangaroo]

I meant to write I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF LIMITLESS IMMIGRATION

[GnuThere]

How about Jackson, WY, where they took down Trump’s picture in city hall?
They’ll love the WY winter I bet!
Or send them all to Guantanamo and vet them for 20-30 more years. Can’t be too careful.

[2ndDivisionVet]

You don’t grock diplomacy at all, do you?

[Velveeta]

Acquiescing to Obama’s “dumb deal” is now known as diplomacy???

[null and void]

Maybe he can place all of them within a half mile of the homes of the judges who won’t allow us to vet immigrants?

[LucyT]

Only if they are settled in D.C., and work in the W.H.

.

[bgill]

Just say no, no, no.

[bgill]

Trump needs to realize he’s the new sheriff in town.

[matthew fuller]

"Not good, indeed. The base (me included) might overlook this one instance."

So you are overlooking Hillary's defacto "pardon"?

[piasa]

No, 99% is for liberals. Muslim hardliners are only 88%.