[ilovesarah2012]

“without evidence”

Kinda like the Russians did it.

[blueyon]

And this is a perfect example of how the left does it...someone posts a story and they ALL run with it to try to DISCREDIT someone they want to take down and they try with NO PROOF just a unnamed source. So DON’T beleive it folks! I assume the LEFT is scared of what might come of the #SethRich investigation (Even Donna Brazile tried to get it called off)

[Always A Marine]

Of course they are right. Democratic National Committee’s Information Systems manager is murdered while walking down the street at 4:00AM and shooter doesn’t bother to take his wallet, expensive watch or his DNC laptop. Nothing at all suspicious. //s//

[central_va]

Seth was shot in the back on a dark street. What more proof do you need that is was a Democrat hit job?

[TTFlyer]

"We have a chance to turn the corner at Fox...."

Yeah, the corner that leads to ratings oblivion.

[seastay]

So lets get this straight; a low level staff member, someone who manages the coffee pool at a news organization should be making policy about what is news instead of the award winning journalists, who have actually interviewed some of the major players of this story? Not only make policy but this person is even newsworthy ? This is news now?

[Sidebar Moderator]

The “sources” are Rupert Murdoch’s two liberal sons who are systematically and criminally destroying FNC.

[Grampa Dave]

This just reaffirms my decision to boycott Faux after they tried to lynch Trump in Iowa and planned to at the debate, he
decided not to go to.

That decision by Trump ties in with a great cartoon on the Compost which we can’t post. Below is the link to this cartoon.

https://www.arcamax.com/newspics/153/15364/1536440.gif

[rwoodward]

so its ok for the boy-toy Shep Smith to repeat the Russian collusion day after day with no evidence and no sources. But not ok for Hannity to report a story with an actual source and email evidence? unfair and out of balance!

[Pravious]

So, some unnamed liberal nobody is not happy that their agenda isn’t being followed. Gosh... that’s certainly newsworthy.

[CincyRichieRich]

I hope Hannity doesn’t hold back. He really has nothing to lose.

[Lexington Green]

Un-named Staffers = Fake News

[DoughtyOne]

FReepers, it's time to get serious about retiring this FReep-a-thon.


Free Republic, the Home of the Eternal FReeper, Conservatism's Finest  (timely thoughts on the FReeper dynamic and Free Republic)

Ramirez political cartoon: Impeachment Chicken Little LARGE VERSION 05/20/2017: LINK  LINK to regular sized versions of his political cartoons (archive).

Please join the monthlies, an automated way to help support Free Republic.

If you are not opting to join the automated monthly support program, please consider joining the One One Done project.  LINK

FReepers, 54.79% of the Second Quarter FReep-a-thon goal has been met.  Click above and pencil in your donation now.  Please folks, lets end this FReepathon.  Thank you!
...this is a general all-purpose message, and should not be seen as targeting any individual I am responding to...

[FreeReign]

"It hurts those of us who are legitimately focused on journalism," one employee told CNN.

The sources in this article are unnamed.

What kind of "real" source would go to CNN to complain about Fox being "illegitimate"?

This reeks of FakeNews.

[Rockitz]

You know if this all works out, the people may never vote for democrats ever again... ;o)

[sickoflibs]

Maybe Hannity decided to play from Rachel Maddow’s playbook since Maddow’s show is beating FNC and she is spinning crazy conspiracy stories every show.

[Jayster]

1. If Rich was murdered in a robbery gone wrong, why was his wallet, watch, and phone left behind?

2. Why haven’t the DNC offered a reward for information related to his murder?

3. Why are the left-wing and mainstream media mostly ignoring the case?

4. Why is Wikileaks offering a reward for information on Seth Rich’s murderer just days after the murder? (Wikileaks’s never divulge their sources)

5. Julian Assange and Wikileaks have a reputation of being 100% accurate and have stated that the Russians or any Government were not the source of their leaks yet offer a reward for someone that they are not supposed to know. Why is that?

6. Where is Seth Richs laptop and what information is on it relating to the case?

7. Why didn’t the DNC allow the FBI to look at their servers after the Russian hacking claim?

8. Why is it that we are relying on a 3rd party (CrowdStrike) as the sole source of the hacking story with no involvement with law enforcement?

9. Did the U.S. government do any real analysis of its own on the DNC hack, or did it just copy/paste Crowdstrike?

[Vlad The Inhaler]

Marie Harf-wit, is that you?

[McGruff]

[Arthur McGowan]

“Conspiracy theory”—a favorite phrase of the mindless.