Posted on 05/22/2017 2:52:48 AM PDT by taildragger
Freepers many sources of which I will link too, it broke here on local Radio and TV. Some are FR not approved so will be links only.
64 was a leaf spring rear end. The Galaxies after that went Coil 2 or 4 link after that for a while. the big block 500’s w/ floor shifts, options are commanding big money. Personally I like the 65’s and 66’s, 67’s are ok.
REPORT: Ford Board of Directors Will Fire Mark Fields as CEO
Sundance's take.
“...A bit off topic, but does anyone here remember the Galaxie model that was made by Ford in the 1960s? One vintage car dealership in my locale some years back had a red 1964 one up for sale and it was just a gorgeous looking car. Any opinions on it concerning how it drove, etc?...”
I know a little bit..not much. I believe it could be had with a 289, 390 or 427 engine. The 289 was the base engine, I think. The 390 was the most common. The 427 was rare and the most of the Galaxy 500s were the 390. I think it could be had with a 4-speed manual, but most were autos. We used to cruise around in a friend’s ‘64 390 Galaxie 500 2-door hardtop all the time. Like almost all full-size cars of the ‘60s, it was a boat. Plush ride, poor brakes and hardly any corning ability. It was a competitor to the Chevy Impala and the Plymouth Belvedere. From what I remember, it was slowest of the three with comparable engines. Still, it was one heckuva cruiser. We had a lot of good times in that car.
Hey, that little turbocharged V6 isn’t cheap, you know...
And making the pick-up frame aluminum. I know a body shop owner, long a Ford truck man, who said that was a huge mistake. He recently opted for a GM over a Ford because of it.
The bed is aluminum alloy. The frame is steel.
http://www.ford.com/trucks/f150/2017/
Scroll about half-way down the page.
Actually, the body and bed are aluminum alloy, not just the bed.
All the advertisements I heard from Ford stated that the frame was made from,”military grade aluminum”. You may know something that Ford’s Advertising Department or whatever the political correct term is doesn’t.
Bed and cab, basically the whole body, sounds like.
I owned a 64 Impala SuperSport back in the mid sixties and remember both the 63 and 64 Galaxy well. Your exactly right re 390 ci engines and the rare 427 but I don’t remember ever seeing a 289 in a Galaxy.
It’s the body, not the frame that’s aluminum.
And despite all of GM’s advertising to the contrary, they’re supposed to have *their* truck converted to aluminum body by next year or the year after.
Check the ads on YouTube and elsewhere. They say steel frame, aluminum body.
Directly from Ford's website. It's a military-grade aluminum alloy body/bed, and a high-strength steel frame.
Or
Replace
Daily
Isn’t GM going aluminum, too, in the upcoming truck models?
Clearly you know nothing about what goes in the board room. One thing and one thing only matters.... stock price. And Ford’s ain’t good.
We have a new 250 with this body/bed. LOVE it!
Body, yes.
Thanks. I don’t keep up closely. I was just going on what I thought I heard from my body man last week. I have a 2010 F-150. Got rear-ended by a couple of dope-heads a couple of weeks ago and it went into the shop this morning to be fixed. My body man said they have not had very good experience with repairing the trucks with aluminum parts. He did not elaborate, so I don’t know the specifics of his complaints. But he is personally staying away from the aluminum.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.