Posted on 05/20/2017 9:16:37 PM PDT by Ray76
“Let’s count the lies in Luther Strange’s first campaign ad!”
http://www.al.com/opinion/index.ssf/2017/05/post_177.html
The GOPE is evil.
Who else does the GOP fight besides conservatives?
No one.
Moore is 70-don’t we have enough gummers? The other 2 are 63-64.
I hope Brooks or Moore wins the GOP primary.
The Alabama GOP lead figures put out the word about a month ago that they didn’t want any of the normal donors sponsoring anyone but Luther Strange.
If you go and look around the state, most people now believe that Strange had some deal brewing with the governor and this was his pay-off.
Presently, I’d say that it’s becoming a crowded field and Strange probably can only take around one-third of the votes in this primary run. Maybe it’s enough to go onto the next round...maybe not.
Can you clarify?
The fear seems to be that Moore is politically too radioactive. For all those whom he would be red meat to, there are others who think this is too extreme, verging on theocracy.
I think it far more important that the people of the US are believing in God than that they have ensconced it in the government’s law. Throwing a Moore over the transom may be an illusory fix if the people aren’t singing off compatible music.
Who is toxic?
On the other hand, one could argue that Republican candidates generally must be better able to handle these questions, because their Democrat opponents will never be asked "gotcha" questions.
-PJ
“The national GOP is promising an initial down payment of $2.6 million in advertising on behalf of Strange.”
Sure would be nice if they could spend some money fighting DEMOCRATS, rather than fighting other Republicans.
...but I suspect that never occurred to them.
The questions would have failed to be “gotcha” if enough of We The People disdained it.
Learning to care like God cares — to outdo the liberals in holy token at their own game, put bluntly — is a sine qua non for We The People if America is to be blessed again.
Moore would be a passing aberration if the people have no, er, mooring.
Neither Brooks nor Moore are an idiot like Todd Akin and neither are “toxic politically”.
“These Senate races of 2012 were lost because of conservatives who were abandoned by the gop-e.
Indiana,
Joe Donnelly (Democratic) 50.0%
Richard Mourdock (Republican) 44.2%
Andrew Horning (Libertarian) 5.7% [
Missouri,
Claire McCaskill (Democratic) 54.8%
Todd Akin (helped by Claire McCaskill defeating Sarah Steelman the Tea Party choice) 39.0% [31]
Jonathan Dine (Libertarian) 6.1% “
The American legal picture has historically been one of “negative rights.” The right to be unmolested, left alone, etc. if one isn’t an offender.
Modern liberals try to add “positive rights” to that picture, but are doing a horrible job of it in many cases. With government put in place of God, they provide a hellish nannydom rather than a blessing.
I would wish that our modern liberals WOULD care for mothers enough that they would honor that over snuffing out their offspring, even inconvenient offspring. But that really needs faith in the Lord in order to fly. And that faith has been abandoned.
We need more than “let the babies alone” to be blessed as a country. We need a full fledged “turn the hearts of the parents to the children and the hearts of the children to the parents.”
Moore could pass judgment after judgment and it would go nowhere — he’d just get elbowed aside — without faith in the Lord first being there.
Politics being the art of the possible, maybe Strange is better in this circumstance of feeble faith. Better than, at best, casting pearls before swine.
Are we to assume Mitt Romney and John McCain were toxic politically and that's why they lost?
Please inform us of your perspective and spin when you throw this cr@p out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.