I typed up a lengthy post responding to your various claims, but then the tab freezed temporarily, and then it logged me out. So, all I can say is:
1. The entire POINT of having media manipulation, or having such a proficiency of control over the media, in other words, is to have totalitarian control over it. Think the S3 Plan from Metal Gear Solid 2, for example. And considering Walter Cronkite was exposed in FBI files to have actually been very much involved in the AWM, to such an extent that he even loaned a certain Anti-War senator a CBS chopper to deliver him to a rally, I have my doubts about the media truly being against the AWM: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kyle-drennen/2010/05/14/
2. Stone would actually have been involved in the cover up, actually, especially when he was one of the people who was part of the coverup. In fact, the disinformation campaign actually used a lot of the same guys as the ones who made that slanderous claim that Pope Pius XII was pro-Nazi, specifically Victor Perlo, aka Raid or Raider, Carlo Marzani, aka Nord, as aforementioned, and, yes, Stone himself, who went by the codename Blin, and had been a KGB agent since 1944 when he received money from the Kremlin.
3. Regarding Che, it would most certainly have been just as bad as assassinating a sitting president. If they had no qualms with ensuring he was lionized instead of, you know, erased from human memory, they most certainly wouldn’t have any qualms with assassinating a sitting president and then covering THAT up.
4. There are plenty of sources that indicate the Soviets had in fact been responsible for the death of JFK. Like for example, the JFK Assassination Tapes by Max Holland. There’s also Disinformation by Ion Mihai Pacepa and Professor Ronald J. Rychlak, and that contains even MORE new information there besides what I had already covered before this post.
There was nothing out of the USSR that was NOT disinformation nor was it limited to foreign nations but reached its height wrt its own population. JFK’s death would have no effect on this.
It was not possible for the CIA to have implemented control over portions of the media, not that it did not try. But recall there were media outlets which were Right-leaning and they were very much against the AWM. It was not till late in the game that certain elements came out openly against it.
It have no idea what the S3 plan is. But is also true that there were very few Senators who supported it, opposition was politically deadly as the Nixon election by the “Silent Majority” in 1972. Most Americans were against it but did not fight back allowing it to succeed.
Whereas the Pope may not have been pro-Nazi, you have to admit that the organization of the “Ratline” was a disgraceful episode in the history of the Roman Catholic Church.
While I rarely read the New Republic, I am unaware of it taking a position on the Assassination. It disinformation involved a far different intent.
It is silly to claim that assassinating Che would be anything like assassinating JFK. Even had the US done it, the USSR would not have done doodley squat about it. It is certainty that that would not have resulted in nuclear war.
It would have been the most dangerous act in history had the Soviets been behind the killing. I do not care what Pacepa says about it, his “revelations” are merely another version of the Lone Assassin theory. His knowledge of KGB’s actions is limited by the nature of Intelligence operational methods.
I will continue to examine ALL theories about the killing but the least probable explanation is that the KGB did it.