Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Petrosius

Let us pray this is real and he signs such an order tomorrow.

Sadly we will probably only have until Monday until a liberal judge somewhere in a blue state illegally puts it on hold. Which will go unchallenged.


4 posted on 05/03/2017 8:56:19 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (The Civil Rights movement compared content of their character to skin color and chose the latter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003

That is what I’m concerned with too. It seems the President’s team of lawyers is unfortunately very easy to outfox. If they did due diligence before these Executive Orders were issued, the legality should be close to air tight, instead, it appears any first year law student is able to spot loopholes and swat the Ex.Order down for an indefinite period of time.
Maybe the White House Attorneys will learn from their hard knocks of the last few weeks.


7 posted on 05/03/2017 9:02:33 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003
Since the precedent has been set for “withholding funding for sanctuary cities,” that means that States can also refuse to support gay marriage without penalty. I'd like to see a couple of States test this.
8 posted on 05/03/2017 9:03:37 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson