Replies

1.) How about creating MANY pro-conservative TV channels/other non-leftist TV channels, and doing so, everywhere in the entire world? The demand for non-leftist TV channels has been ongoing, for many decades and counting! 2.) There are law abiding American citizens AND LEGAL U.S. immigrants who are more than willing to contribute money, in order to get the wall built, finally! Politicians are ignoring them and being foolish about this missed opportunity! Everybody who, really, wants to contribute money towards building the wall=enough money AND QUICKLY! ALL problems related to illegal immigration, gang transactions, and illegal drug transactions are more than enough of an incentive to get all of the money needed to make the actual wall, finally, happen! 3.) What good is the final health care legislation, if, even, Congress (and other federal jobs), still, wants to exempt themselves from it? MAKE THE FINAL LEGISLATION SOMETHING THAT, EVEN, CONGRESS WANTS TO BE A PART OF, BECAUSE IT WOULD BE CRAZY TO EXEMPT CONGRESS FROM IT=IT’S THAT GOOD! Anything less than this is, still, unacceptable and not good enough! 4. The issue of “entitlement program reforms” is being brought up, yet again, and I have my own opinions on this: ALL entitlement programs, really, should become FULLY PRIVATIZED, asap, but the status quo should, also, be kept in place as an option for everybody who wants to keep it as is. Each individual person has their own wants, needs, and ideas as to what they want to happen with all entitlement programs, including, but not limited to, opting out of entitlement programs completely. All options should be allowed to exist as a way of dealing with all entitlement program wants, needs, and ideas of each individual person. I’m against the idea of, only, partial privatization of all of the entitlement programs, instead of full privatization, for several reasons: 1.) Partial privatization gives the left a “foot in the door” to use against non-leftists, by allowing the left to say,”If privatizations is the way to go to reform all of the entitlement programs and is “so wonderful”, then why only partial privatization, instead of full privatization?”; 2.) It discriminates against the ages of each individual person, where present retirees and soon-to-be retired are forced into the present entitlement programs ONLY, like it or not, and not allowed the voluntary option of doing what younger generations will have available to them. The opposite is, also, true, where younger generations of people will be given a variety of options with the exception of the status quo system that’s in place right now.; 3.) All court cases created, because of what I mentioned above. All entitlement program reforms=As flexible as is possible for each individual person. Those, of any age, who want the changes to happen=OK! Those, of any age, who want the entitlement programs “status quo”=OK! Be as flexible as is possible for everybody and, fully, tend to each individuals wants, needs, and ideas about all of the entitlement programs, including the option of opting out of any to all of the entitlement programs, completely. Anything less than this will not be good enough of a solution. 5.)The GOP needs legitimate ideas on how to increase their total vote numbers throughout all “blue areas” of the U.S. and U.S. territories. This includes all U.S. cities and all U.S. territory cities. It’s the cities that the GOP has the most problems in gaining any political advantages. This is even more of the case when attempting to bring conservatism into U.S. cities. In most cases, whenever the GOP does win any political offices from within the cities, they are non-conservatives. So, how does the GOP, finally, end the losing streak from within U.S. cities, and how do conservatives, finally, end the, even bigger, losing streak from within U.S. cities? Is it even possible to do so?