Posted on 04/30/2017 5:17:54 AM PDT by Kaslin
Like E.F. Hutton, when the United Nations’ Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights “Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health” talks, people listen.
In disbelief, perhaps. Or amusement. But they listen.
Well, at least Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank listens, anyway.
Unfortunately, Milbank couldn’t get Dr. Dainius Puras to talk.
Puras is the Lithuanian serving as the U.N.’s “Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to blah, blah, blah.” Milbank did, however, uncover an “urgent appeal” sent by Puras to the U.S. State Department, with instructions to pass it along to U.S. congressional leaders.
Dr. Puras won’t discuss his confidential February correspondence until June, when “it becomes public at the next session of the Human Rights Council.” But the “leaked” five-page letter announces the U.N. has launched an investigation to determine whether repealing the Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as Obamacare, violates international law.
As Milbank offers, “It turns out that the notion that ‘health care is a right’ is more than just a Democratic talking point.”
The letter cites possible U.S. transgression of Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which proclaims, “Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.”
This is standard U.N. legal speak: triumphantly overstated; unenforceably vague.
It’s no surprise once one realizes the U.N. represents the governments of the world, not the people. It never addresses discernable individual rights to life, free speech, freedom of the press or the free exercise of religion. Instead, the socialist-oriented organization proclaims a “right to a standard of living adequate for . . . health and well-being.”
Who is to determine the meaning of “adequate”? And are all the countries currently on the U.N. Human Rights Council — such as China, Cuba, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela — providing the people over whom they rule adequate “well-being”?
Dr. Puras’s letter references other U.N. gobbledygook, including Article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. That sacrosanct document requires States to “recognize the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health,” including the “prevention, treatment and control of epidemic, endemic, occupational and other diseases,” as well as the “creation of conditions which would assure to all medical service and medical attention in the event of sickness.”
An implied threat is delivered against repealing any government-provided medical benefit, declaring “there is a strong presumption that retrogressive measures taken in relation to health are not permissible.”
“The letter urges that ‘all necessary interim measures be taken to prevent the alleged violations’” Milbank explains, “and asks that, if the ‘allegations’ proved correct, there be ‘adequate measure . . . to guarantee the accountability of any person responsible.’”
Should Congress repeal Obamacare, will U.N. troops occupy Washington, arresting congressmen for voting against its mandate?
The international body has no way “to impose its will,” acknowledges Milbank, seeming to wish it did and complaining that folks just “scoff at lectures from U.N. bureaucrats.”
Don’t scoff at their scoffing. It’s a reasonable response to a long history of incompetence, corruption and worse. Throughout the world, people all across the political spectrum — from the UK’s Daniel Hannan to former First Daughter Chelsea Clinton — upbraid the U.N. for its poor track record.
Earlier this month, the Associated Press released a report alleging nearly 2,000 instances of U.N. “peacekeepers” sexually abusing Haitians — including hundreds of children — along with no arrests and zero accountability. The report followed a 2016 report of sexual crimes committed by U.N. peacekeepers in the Central African Republic and many other such reports before that.
Taking solace from the Special Rapporteur’s letter, Milbank declares: “[T]he U.N. letter is at least a bit of moral support for those defending Obamacare.”
Moral support?
From the U.N.?
Now, you’re pulling my leg.
Will the 9th Circuit allow the appeal of Obamacare? I thought they had the final say in everything.
Ditto.
The 9th circuit will be ruling on the NASCAR Race tomorrow if Dale, Jr doesn’t win today. ;-)
Is this a joke?
LOVE LOVE LOVE IT-———MYOFBUNWSYTUHTSOMYFUBOIFG.
Great point as the US healthcare debate has shifted from should we have universal coverage to how are we going to pay for it.
Don’t give a flying rats ass what the UN will or will not permit.
I don’t recall that we even asked them!
The UN is outdated, useless and expensive. Time to move on!
In protest, the UN should quit accepting our money.
UN bureaucrats are covered by Obamacare ?
Will they throw us out of the UN if we don’t comply?
Will they throw us out of the UN if we don’t comply?
Screw the UN. Rotten corrupt piece of communists and dictators that are useless.
Obamacare won’t be repealed, because it can’t be repealed - or, more exactly, it can’t be repealed without ushering in huge Democratic majorities in the House and the Senate.
Members of Congress don’t know much, but they can count votes like a pimp in a whorehouse can count money.
Yes, the voters “hate Obamacare and want it repealed”. That is absolutely true.
It’s also true that they want the ability to buy insurance for pre-existing conditions, want insurance companies to be forbidden to cancel policies for non-payment, want zero payment at the point of service, want their adult children who are smoking dope in a dive in Oakland to stay covered, want their States to expand Medicaid without taxes going up, and so on.
In other words, the only two things they hate about Obamacare are paying for it, and the name.
Republicans in Congress understand this perfectly well, which is why there’s no plan.
And, not coincidentally, Obamacare (and Romneycare) were the culmination of fifty years of “reform”, all of which had the purpose of destroying the private sector or making it impossible for the private sector to function, except for boob jobs and a few other things. And, by 2009, the mission was largely accomplished.
Obamacare was merely a temporary mop-up operation, until full nationalization was possible.
And now, it is.
Like Nixon to China, Trump will propose single payer within the year. It’s really the only way out at this point.
And before you accuse me of favoring it, realize that it will destroy a lifetime of work for me. I don’t like it - I hate it.
But it’s coming, because it’s what the voters, bless their pointy little heads, want.
What a horrible waste of ammunition.One round per customer,that’s all that’s allowed(or required).
We couldn’t get that lucky.
To paraphrase Stalin... “How many divisions does the UN have???”
If the US stops sending their $$ there won’t be any UN. guess it goes without saying that it would be a good thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.