Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hodar
His only "crime" was that he identified himself as an engineer when he sent his correspondence to the city or county government.

If I presented an opinion on a legal matter and I identified myself as a lawyer in my correspondence with the governing body I was dealing with, you can be damn sure that the state bar association would have a problem with it (and rightfully so) if I wasn't really a lawyer.

21 posted on 04/27/2017 3:07:29 PM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Maybe he drives a train.


22 posted on 04/27/2017 3:08:43 PM PDT by artichokegrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

“If I presented an opinion on a legal matter and I identified myself as a lawyer in my correspondence with the governing body I was dealing with, you can be damn sure that the state bar association would have a problem with it (and rightfully so) if I wasn’t really a lawyer. “

You are confusing ambiguous reference to credentials with the commission of prohibited acts.

Generally the law prohibits “the unauthorized PRACTICE of [engineering, law]. Stating “I am a [lawyer, engineer, doctor] and this is what I think about what you are doing” even if you were not licensed, when you hadn’t actually done anything, and weren’t hired by anyone and weren’t purporting to represent anyone other than yourself, is not the practice of anything.


54 posted on 04/27/2017 4:43:25 PM PDT by Flash Bazbeaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson