Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Two Kids' Dad

“the problem will fix itself over time.”

While forcing non-smokers to bear the adverse affects of the smokers. I know that in some states you cannot create a “health nuisance” by smoking so as to cause the discomfort of others irrespective of the terms of your occupancy of your property. I would not be willing to wait for the offenders to “die off.” Smoking is a filthy habit.


23 posted on 04/18/2017 8:02:03 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: vette6387
While forcing non-smokers to bear the adverse affects of the smokers.

This makes it appear you are advocating for non-smokers to have the right to abrogate smoker's lawful rights. Is that your position?

39 posted on 04/19/2017 8:12:54 AM PDT by MortMan (Attractive physicists have an exceptional incidence of thermal presence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: vette6387

.....” forcing non-smokers to bear the adverse affects of the smokers”.....

Well...if there’s smoking in a complex you can always choose another complex with no-smoking rules already established.
Nobody is “forcing” anything.

It’s like a neighborhood choice...you get to choose.


46 posted on 04/19/2017 10:42:00 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson