Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vette6387
While forcing non-smokers to bear the adverse affects of the smokers.

This makes it appear you are advocating for non-smokers to have the right to abrogate smoker's lawful rights. Is that your position?

39 posted on 04/19/2017 8:12:54 AM PDT by MortMan (Attractive physicists have an exceptional incidence of thermal presence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: MortMan

“This makes it appear you are advocating for non-smokers to have the right to abrogate smoker’s lawful rights. Is that your position?”

Absolutely!!! NO ONE has a “lawful right” to endanger the health of anyone else, and allowing even second-hand tobacco smoke to permeate someone else’s residence is criminal. And BTW, Smoking isn’t a right! There is a lot not to like about things here in California today, but this state’s anti-smoking laws are not part of that. We had an abrupt jerk back to “the days of old” when we went to Las Vegas to see one of our daughters perform and had to walk through the casino of the hotel to get to the show room. It was awful!


40 posted on 04/19/2017 8:39:11 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson