Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nathanbedford; DoughtyOne
Have you even looked at your own "scoresheet"?

Why don't you compute the percentage of questions where your answer had the "betrayal" option checked?

It's just ridiculous. You're just ridiculous.

You're utterly incapable of anything even remotely resembling a fair-minded "valuation" of President Trump.

Your built-in bias loudly proclaims its own irrelevancy.

You've clearly learned nothing from your "timeout"—a form of punishment traditionally reserved for children.

Perhaps you missed this statement in my post: "I also recognize that at this stage, 100 days, it is unreasonable to expect virtually any undertaking to be fully accomplished..."

Apparently, you missed your own statement above.

I counted approximately 23 "valuation" questions on your scoresheet.

Of that 23, you've scored no less than 7 questions (approximately 1/3) as including the "betrayal" tag.

Now, betrayal carries an implication of finality about it, so on that basis alone, it's patently ridiculous to call anything a "betrayal" at this juncture.

The first 100 days haven't even elapsed yet—and you stipulate to the fact that nothing could be deemed "fully accomplished".

And yet (of course) things are "fulllyl accomplished" enough for you to display the unmitigated gall to deem several items as a "betrayal".

For those 7 items or so, of course, there are a plethora of additional reasons to reject your "betrayal" classification.

Thanks so much for your "scoresheet", or, as it should more appropriately be named, "proof positive that nathanbedford is utterly incapable of overcoming his profound bias against President Trump".

You can be as intelligent, conservative, eloquent, and erudite as anyone on God's green earth, and it will never obscure the fact that you're a Trump-hating clown who is simply unable to learn from his mistakes.

Of course, to learn from one's mistakes, it's necessary to acknowledge them first.

Unlike President Trump, you truly deserve all the criticism you receive.

You've become a caricature of your former self, and at this point, I don't think you'll ever be able to "evaluate" President Trump fairly or objectively, much less ever give him the benefit of the doubt.

I hereby reiterate my sincere belief that you're functionally aiding and abetting the Enemy with your constant derogation and nitpicking of this President. The self-righteous trappings of "critical analysis" and "truth"—which you seem to believe you have a monopoly on—cannot erase the fact that you simply do not like this man, and you never will...

65 posted on 04/18/2017 4:19:15 PM PDT by sargon ("If we were in the midst of a zombie apocalypse, the Left would protest for zombies' rights.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: sargon; nathanbedford

I think you hit pretty close to home there on a number of issues.

It’s not my intent to gang up, so I’ll leave it at that.

I did want you to know I thought your comments were quite good.


69 posted on 04/18/2017 4:33:29 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Happy days are here again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: sargon; nathanbedford
You're utterly incapable of anything even remotely resembling a fair-minded "valuation" of President Trump.

I concur. Nate never supported Trump and did everything he could in his own little world to undermine and compromise the Trump. And he still is. This guy putting up questionnaires or polls regarding Trump are 100% fake.

84 posted on 04/18/2017 6:14:09 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson