Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK
“Further, by 1787 five Northern states already began abolition and now 90% of the Constitution signing slaveholders were Southern.”

For the purpose of this post, let's stipulate that most northerners knew human bondage was morally wrong and that, in their hearts of good intentions, they really wanted to stop profiting from America's guest worker program.

If true, that would make the decision of northern states to vote to unambiguously include slavery in the U. S. constitution all the more appalling.

418 posted on 04/30/2017 4:47:35 PM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies ]


To: jeffersondem
jeffersondem: "If true, that would make the decision of northern states to vote to unambiguously include slavery in the U. S. constitution all the more appalling."

Appalling that Northerners were willing to sacrifice their abolitionist principles to achieve national unity?
Appalling that Northerners considered their Union more important that abolition?
Appalling that Northerners were willing to delay by generations the South's "come to Jesus" on slavery moment?

Sure, appalling to committed slaveholders, not so much to any others.

421 posted on 05/01/2017 4:30:37 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson