Where's the guy I voted for? Did they lock him in the basement?
Hmmm..CNN now joins MSNBC, McCain, Lindsey, Schumer, Pelosi, Hillary, ISIS, AL Nusra, Al-Qaeda, Elliot Abrams (Neocon central), IMC, IC, House of Saud and many others in cheering on Trump’s attack on Assad.
With friends like this....
In the ME, we just never know who the good guys are.. To me, I am not certain if this is some plan straight out of the Palestinian playbook, or a real attack. The Syrian rapefugee crisis started with a dead Aleppo child washing up in front of a camera.
If you are going to act, it must be swift, bold, but every ME conflict we have been into is a disaster. Blood, lives and money, wasted in places that I am not sure are better off. I think we fail to grasp deeply, the religious schisms of Islam and their absolute willingness to inflict torture on other human beings.
This one is about a gas pipeline that has been in the works for years.. so why antagonize Russia? We have no business in Syria. It’s some proxy war with Russia and whomever, over a gas pipeline.
You have to wonder about the strategery going forward and if Banon et al are on board.
The dems have been ready to nuke Russia for a year, Hillary pops her head out of her rathole to complain Trump didn't do enough and she would destroy Syria, and the press falls in line oh look, Hillary is all for it - do a Hillary, Trump!! Yay Trump is doing what Hillary wants! Yay Trump isn't a mental case after all! Yay Trump stood up to Russia he's not a puppet! Suckers all of them.
They got no game left, so, what's yours, nub? Did you break a nail firing a tomahawk or what?
Where's the guy I voted for? Did they lock him in the basement?
Every broken clock is right twice a day.
This whole "guilt by association" stunt is comical.
The people you mentioned are a bunch of hawks. Hawks always support military action. It's what hawks do.
The fact that neo-con war hawks occasionally overlap with the thinking of real adults every once in a while is pure coincidence, and cannot be logically used to criticize the very limited action which occurred—action which was the result of extreme provocation.
This situation required leadership in response—not empty threats like the previous administration levied...
Thanks for the list
[CNN, MSNBC, McCain, Lindsey, Schumer, Pelosi, Hillary, ISIS, AL Nusra, Al-Qaeda, Elliot Abrams, IMC, IC, House of Saud]