To: ForYourChildren
“He told his secretary of state to do ‘whatever she thought was best’ to protect U.S. weapons deals with Former Libyan Prime Minister Muammar Gaddafi from being transferred into German hands.”
Why would Gaddafi be transferring weapons to the Germans and why would we care if he did?
44 posted on
04/07/2017 10:10:00 PM PDT by
arrogantsob
(Check out "CHAOS AND MAYHEM" at Amazon.com.)
To: arrogantsob
He wanted to be the one supplying Gaddafi from American arms manufacturers instead of letting H&K of Germany get the contracts (and losing his kickbacks).
66 posted on
04/07/2017 10:54:24 PM PDT by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: arrogantsob
More specifically, Obama wanted to keep his weapons deals with Gaddafi intact instead of letting Gaddafi decide that he was going to buy weapons from the German arms makers instead. Gaddafi was either the buyer or the interim receiver of the weapons in question, Obama was a seller or provider who didn’t want Gaddafi jumping ship to the German store.
67 posted on
04/07/2017 10:57:28 PM PDT by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: arrogantsob
Why would Gaddafi be transferring weapons to the Germans and why would we care if he did?So they wouldn't use them to bomb Pearl Harbor again? Love, Otter
74 posted on
04/08/2017 1:44:35 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO! #MyPresident #MAGA #Winning)
To: arrogantsob
Wonder if “weapons” was a code word for “gold”? Where exactly is the gold which Qaddafi was planning to use for a gold based banking system in Africa?
78 posted on
04/08/2017 2:26:36 AM PDT by
The Westerner
(Protect the most vulnerable: get the government out of medicine and education!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson