Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/05/2017 8:36:57 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sukhoi-30mki

Nice to see my dad’s old squadron in the news...


2 posted on 04/05/2017 8:43:02 PM PDT by null and void (Drain the swamp! Get rid of the mosque-itoes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Don’t forget the harriers were used to defend Miami in true lies!


3 posted on 04/05/2017 8:43:53 PM PDT by Mouton (There is a new sheriff in town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The reason the Harrier is still around is because there is no better weapons platform for close air support for the Marines.

It can land and takeoff vertically anywhere, fly 900 miles at 662 mph and carry 15,000 pounds of bombs and rockets. Oh, and is has a 25mm cannon.

Eventually the F-35B STOVL will replace it.


4 posted on 04/05/2017 8:51:52 PM PDT by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“... highest accident rate....”. That is a meaningless statistic and represents sloppy reporting and logic. In any ranking there will always be a “highest” and “lowest”. What is its accident rate? Is it acceptable given the aircraft’s mission and complexity?


5 posted on 04/05/2017 8:52:15 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

VSOL aircraft are simply going to have a higher accident rate then conventional


6 posted on 04/05/2017 8:55:05 PM PDT by tophat9000 (Tophat9000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

What my husband wouldn’t give to strap one of those puppies back on for a joyride.

Can’t help but wonder if the lower fatality numbers are a result of lower monthly flight hours due to military budget cuts.

Regardless, the harriers are still the same ones my husband flew before he 1st came off active duty in 1998. Those birds were falling apart back then!

Democrat presidents and usurpers suck.


7 posted on 04/05/2017 9:03:03 PM PDT by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (Impeach the Liar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

It’s far better than the F-35 for the USMC. It’s not a tempting aircraft for the USAF theater commander to want to Shanghai for non-CAS missions.
And for CAS, its ridiculous to pretend a 35 can do the job of a Harrier.


11 posted on 04/05/2017 9:30:41 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

We have a friend who was an engineer on the first-generation Hornets. They had a problem with stress cracks at the base of the vertical stabilizers.

Turns out it was the Marine pilots frequently taking them to maximum-G turns to show their Marine-ness.


13 posted on 04/05/2017 9:49:32 PM PDT by lurk (TEat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I know the major defense contractors— BAE, Lockheed, et. al— are moving toward the idea of unmanned (pilotless) aircraft. When you think about it it does seem antiquated to have a person sitting inside controlling it, with all the human factors problems involved. Due to AI and robotics technology the job of pilot is on the endangered list. Sad but inevitable.


17 posted on 04/05/2017 10:40:44 PM PDT by AC Beach Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

L8R


18 posted on 04/05/2017 10:43:00 PM PDT by huldah1776 ( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki
"originally designed to have a 6,000-hour airframe...the Department of the Navy began to look at it differently than just a static number of hours the plane could fly before it was expected to wear out.
It was determined that the Harrier would be able to fly well beyond the original 6,000-hour estimate.
The Harrier inventory with this new criterion is estimated to have exhausted less than 40 percent of its useful life."

Now 6K flight-hours is only 40% of it's service life?
That's just damned scary, even if you've SLEP'd them.

21 posted on 04/06/2017 4:11:31 AM PDT by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I would think that the A-10 would have been a better fit for Marines than anything else. With that said I have never heard of the Marines having used them.


23 posted on 04/06/2017 7:08:50 AM PDT by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

BTTT


25 posted on 04/06/2017 9:04:02 AM PDT by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson