What about “Red Skins” or “Yellow Skins”? Are they Banned too?
This is a good thing.
Blacks have a better viewpoint on what’s best for their communities than angry white progressives who use blacks as a way to express THEIR hatred of traditional Americans.
A large black organization will become more moderate and effective without white liberal haters running the group.
Apparently those who obsess on the past so that they cannot escape it are doomed to repeat it too.
Hey “honkeys”, this is a good thing ! The racist bastards are probably saving your lives at some point in the game ! Just imagine the next big protest where the feral animals get worked into a frenzy and start burning, breaking, blocking highways, looting and the such, then it turns reeealy violent . . . . and they strike out at Y O U !!
Believe me white folks, you don’t belong in THAT crowd.
Stay away from the HATERS ! ! !
Snoot ;o)
Not much an Open Meeting, no?
SMH Ping.
If they are meeting at a city owned facility then shouldn’t segregated events be illegal?
Can the whites have a separate but equal meeting?
Self hating white liberals and leftists, how does it feel to be used and thrown away? Have a great day!
Oh yeah, no surprise there. Its just like those stories of a guy running around attacking people while yelling slurs and wanting to ‘hurt white people’.... One such the Toronto Machete attack, 2015
And then several days later the news reports ‘still no motive identified’. Or how Judge Harten ruled that a person who just yelled “I hate white people” as they randomly punched a white woman, knocking out here tooth, was not a hate crime.
Why do you want to support people who despise you? I acknowledge their right to do as they please, but that is a far cry from support.
I've previously read that during the slave years, in Virginia, a Quadroon was considered legally Caucasian.
The "One-Drop Rule" was a 20th Century invention, mainly due to racial covenants in real estate transactions.
Something near 15% of White Americans harbor deep racial feelings, or are what you might call prejudiced. As a race, Caucasians at roughly 85% are by far and away the most permissive and accepting of other races.
That percentage shrinks to 65% of Hispanics who are racially permissive.
Blacks and Asians almost tie for bigotry, with 40% of Blacks being "Okay" with others, and with Asians leading the prejudicial charge at 35% for, and 65% against, the mingling of races, societally and maritally. Within the general heading of "Asian," the Chinese are the most rigid in their refusal to incorporate outside influences within their cultural milieu.
As evidence of this concept, just look at how insular and ethno-centric are the "Chinatowns" in cities from Boston to SanFrancisco. No other national group has come close to recreating their "home country" within the borders of another sovereignty.
However, this extreme on behalf of the Chinese doesn't absolve our Black Americans from responsibility for their contribution to the racial tension in America. Frankly, the Chinese don't create much trouble as a racial unit.
That wouldn't necessarily be true of our Amish teens, for example.
I am all for this. We can now have BLM drinking fountains, bus seats, theater seats etc.
It’s racist!