Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS
I do not criticize the 5 AM tweets because Trump had the wrong goal motivating those tweets. To the contrary, I think it was well directed to try to change the subject from his own alleged collusion with the Russians to throw the election to unlawful surveillance by the Obama administration. My only objection is to the manner of carrying that out. I expressed those objections clearly:

As I said on the very morning when he came out with these tweets at 5 AM, the style of the tweets was extremely ill advised. He has been drubbed unmercifully in the leftist media because his tweet was so ineptly styled. I said then and I say now, he should have consulted with competent attorneys, he should have mobilized the Attorney General, he should have presented his allegations to the public with the full panoply of his office and supported with at least some facts. He left himself open to criticisms for misusing the word "wiretap," for claiming that it occurred in the Trump Tower, and for alleging involvement by Barack Obama himself, without any support then or since then. The tweets were half cocked and the vindication has long since passed the attention span of the public.

That is a pity because it was so easily avoided.

The approval ratings are unanimous and across-the-board. I remind you, Trump lost the popular vote.

I also remind you that shortly after these tweets were released the Obama administration had to make a climbdown announcement that it would not be speaking more on the subject until the conclusion of congressional investigations. The optics of that climbdown suggested that they did not have the goods. More of the pattern of impulsive mismanagement which was not necessary. The same effects of changing the subject could have been obtained with more judicious announcements.

There was no danger of leaks if he managed the matter properly. Nor did he have to wait extended periods of time. Presumably he had some evidence which instigated Trump to tweet, surely some of that could have been alluded to. Lawyers, experienced in matters of proof, might well have told him whether or not they had the goods on Obama himself. They might have told him not to use the word "wiretap." They might have told him to allude to some bit of evidence for credibility. Anyone might have told him to consider a more formal announcement coupled with an announcement of initiation of an investigation. All of these things have been done for generations by savvy presidents working with their advisors. Trump should have availed himself of some of these and he would not have been the object of ridicule across the establishment media for weeks. Yes, of course they will criticize him but perhaps they might not be calling his sanity into question as they have been doing.

As I said, the pity is it was so easily avoided. The same results, turning the question around, could have been achieved without the downside at least in the conservative media although it is pretty clear that the establishment media was not going to cover his allegations seriously and have only begrudgingly started to do so with the revelations about Susan Rice.


148 posted on 04/03/2017 10:44:09 PM PDT by nathanbedford (attack, repeat, attack! Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford

meh


149 posted on 04/03/2017 10:45:44 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (I was conceived in liberty, how about you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

I don’t care how universal the “approval ratings” are, they are as wrong now as they were then. And I don’t have to remind you that but for a mere 510,00 votes, Trump also would have carried 7 more states with another 51 electoral votes.

There is a type of clock in DC that starts a leak-o-meter every moment you delay/discuss a decision.

The wording of the tweet was perfect. Priggish specificity should give way to “communicatin “ every tine. Trump was a genius in this tweet.


155 posted on 04/03/2017 10:55:41 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford
I quote you:

The approval ratings are unanimous and across-the-board. I remind you, Trump lost the popular vote.

Now, where have we heard *that* before?

I tawt I taw a Pussy Hat. /Tweety bird>

159 posted on 04/03/2017 10:59:56 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford
"The approval ratings are unanimous and across-the-board. I remind you, Trump lost the popular vote."

"This is one of the tricks that keeps every good conspiracy theory going. Nobody wants to be the one claiming the emperor has no clothes the day His Highness walks out naked. And this Russia thing has spun out of control into just such an exercise of conspiratorial mass hysteria.

If the party's leaders really believe that Russian intervention is anywhere in the top 100 list of reasons why some 155 million eligible voters (out of 231 million) chose not to pull a lever for Hillary Clinton last year, they're farther along down the Purity of Essence nut-hole than Mark Warner." -Taibbi, 4/3/17


191 posted on 04/04/2017 1:31:36 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (Prosecute the win. Run up the score.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson