Posted on 04/03/2017 1:39:50 PM PDT by Helicondelta
If they can catch enough of the rats and put the squeeze on them, hopefully one or more of them will squeal to save their sorry a$$es.
The law says “foreign intelligence value”. That’s a very broad and imprecise standard.
Scooter never did jail time. Bush commuted the jail part of his sentence. Scooter paid a $250K fine, did 2 years of probation, did community service and lost his law license until it was recently reinstated.
Martha did jail time.
“She is in trouble if the unmasking was improper, meaning that there was no national security reason for doing so and was only for political purposes. “
I could easily come up with a dozen bullshit stories on why the unmasking was of “foreign intelligence value”.
They must come up with the leaker to unwind this and have any hope of criminal charges for anyone.
Stop while you are behind because you are woefully out of your league.
No it won’t be difficult. Either she had proper justification to do so or not. Remember, the unmasking came towards the end of the administration. Even James Clapper said there was no evidence of Trump and his associates conspiring with Russia. So what justification could she then have, other than political, to unmask innocent participants prior to leaving her position and Obama his office?
And just what league is that?
The same league where a plainly written law is easily understood? Or the league where people go off half-cocked without any knowledge of what the law says?
We have no idea what investigations are underway at Justice or another branch of government.
Nice list, but shouldn’t you have included Hillary in any list of corrupt female Democrats in the Obama administration?
James Clapper said there was no evidence of Trump and his associates conspiring with Russia. So how does a political officer like Rice at the NSA have justification to unmask the American participants when there was no proof of any conspiracy?
“foreign intelligence value” has no legal definition and is left solely to the judgement of those empowered to unmask.
I hope so.......
Does anybody here really think Susan Rice thought of doing this all on her own?
Is she one of the 20 that Rogers said had the authority to do it?
To cite ONE example: there was “foreign intelligence value” to unmasking Flynn because of his prospective position and he was talking to the Russian ambassador.
It’s purely a judgement call.
Only 3 people have the power to unmask, Loretta Lynch, John Brennan and Susan Rice.
Calling John Brennan to the witness stand. Sir, was there legal justification (national security) to unmask Trump and his associates and if so, why did you not request that it be done?
Calling James Clapper to the witness stand. Sir, was there legal justification (national security) to unmask Trump and his associates and if so, why did you not request that it be done?
Yes, but I believe the number is three. And she had the legal authority to do so.
I certainly hope so. It’s way, way, way past time to get started draining the swamp.
You note that it has been claimed “Susan Rice pulled intelligence transcripts...” What is most interesting about that is that someone must have told her where to look. Otherwise collating material from NSA intercepts concerning activity within the Trump camp would be like looking for a needle in a haystack.
Sure seems like he’s on the run. It he going to extend his world tour to 2+ years or more?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.