Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 2 April 2017
Various driveby media television networks ^ | 2 April 2017 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 04/02/2017 4:39:46 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



Apr 2nd, 2017

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt; Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): McConnell; Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley; Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas.

THIS WEEK (ABC): Haley; Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain, R-Ariz.; Dmitry Peskov, press secretary to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Reps. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., ranking member of the House intelligence committee; Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, Freedom Caucus founding chairman; Jason Lewis, R-Minn.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: guests; lineup; sunday; talkshows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-207 next last
To: All

Cousin Mike and all....

I am watching Face the Nation, the pundit table. We got David Ignatius of the Wapo, somebody from the NY Times, other know-it-alls.

All they are talking about is Trump’s “collusion” with the Russians.

Yet Hillary sells rights to US uranium mines to the Russians, Podesta dealt with some bank, numerous ties of Clintons to Russia....Why aren’t they sitting around the table discussing ALL THIS?

They sit and talk, all serious and somber, about some rookie presidential candidate and how he, with help from Putin, plotted to overthrow the world that they may both be hailed and cheered Kings of the World.

Yet the people with the REAL power were making deals and clicking buttons and getting ten million dollars in speaking fees for one, maybe two sentences.

Cousin Mike....why isn’t our side out and about and pointing all this out? Editorials in the WSJ, called for press conferences....hell get President Trump to start tweeting!

THEY CONSTANTLY SET THE DIALOGUE!

With no opposition party in sight.


141 posted on 04/02/2017 9:03:26 AM PDT by Fishtalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Saveourcountry

There was no collusion. If there were, then it would be devastating with no real defense. Let’s stick to the actual allegations and not even give the hint that the Russian involvement served a useful purpose.


142 posted on 04/02/2017 9:05:55 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222

Tough one to answer....


143 posted on 04/02/2017 9:06:40 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Home of the Free because of the brave.MAGA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
As some and myself have posted, the only way this Russia thing has any legs is with the help of the Republican party.

An attempt at diversion for actually accomplishing any of their campaign promises?

Hence the problem, the “their” in “playing right into their hands” looks to include both Dems and Reps.

144 posted on 04/02/2017 9:07:06 AM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk
where the hell is Donald Trump now that I think about it?

Actually, I believe he is on a golf course with Rand Paul.

145 posted on 04/02/2017 9:07:47 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (The fear of stark justice sends hot urine down their thighs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

Really?

Okay, another intriguing question....WHERE IS BARACK OBAMA?

I heard he was on some island with 64 other males....seriously.


146 posted on 04/02/2017 9:09:23 AM PDT by Fishtalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk
WHERE IS BARACK OBAMA?...I heard he was on some island with 64 other males....seriously.

Probably, exchanging terminal STDs with them no doubt.

147 posted on 04/02/2017 9:11:23 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (The fear of stark justice sends hot urine down their thighs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

“Chunk, with his prison beard”—Chris Plante


148 posted on 04/02/2017 9:13:58 AM PDT by CDB (An action is worth a thousand words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought
As some and myself have posted, the only way this Russia thing has any legs is with the help of the Republican party.

I never thought of that but you have a point.

149 posted on 04/02/2017 9:18:25 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Home of the Free because of the brave.MAGA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
Obama must be held accountable. He is a dangerous, divisive force unrestrained now by the Presidency. He will be a malevolent political force for the next 20 to 30 years. He will be actively involved in shaping policies and undermining the GOP. He is running the Dem Party. Perez is just a tool of Obama.

For the next two years, Obama and Jarret will be running a shadow government and devote their efforts towards the 2018 midterms. Obama will do whatever is necessary to cement his policies and protect his legacy. The MSM will act as the propaganda arm. Obama will be high profile once his book is ghostwritten and he goes on his book tour to coincide with the upcoming midterms.

Trump needs to ensure that Obama's crimes are made public and that he and his henchmen are held accountable. I was encouraged when Trump tweeted about Obama being behind him being wiretapped. The MSM, Dems, GOPe, and some conservatives distanced themselves quickly from these explosive charges, but I have no doubt that Trump will be vindicated if the information is made public. He would not make such a charge without having some proof. Hopefully, there are still patriots within the Deep State who will come forward with the truth.

150 posted on 04/02/2017 9:18:33 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Excellent post! I can’t disagree. Let’s hope it happens.


151 posted on 04/02/2017 9:20:40 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Home of the Free because of the brave.MAGA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: kabar

You say: “There was no collusion. If there were, then it would be devastating with no real defense. Let’s stick to the actual allegations and not even give the hint that the Russian involvement served a useful purpose.”

Of course there was no collusion. That is not the point. They continue to rotely say this over and over. It is hard to show these idiots respect, I admit, but if you do show them the respect of making them think about what they are actually saying, it shuts them up. I have tried it over and over. It works. After they are unable to respond to what exactly was done to damage Hillary, it opens the door to make valid points that actually make sense.


152 posted on 04/02/2017 9:22:53 AM PDT by Saveourcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
That would be playing right into their hands,IMHO.This whole thing can't end soon enough for me.

If the subject becomes the surveillance of the Trump campaign and transition team using Russia as the pretext for doing so, then I hope it becomes front and center for a year.

IMO the let's move on narrative is being pushed now by the Dems and MSM because they know there is no evidence to support the allegation that Trump colluded with the Russians. They do know that there is some there there when it comes to the Obama administration illegally spying on the Trump campaign and the transition team. They would like for that to go away along with the Russia collusion narrative by coupling them together. I suspect that the GOPe would like to move on as well.

153 posted on 04/02/2017 9:25:01 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

Maybe the current “Healthy Hillary” IS the double?


154 posted on 04/02/2017 9:27:10 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Keep fighting the Left and their Fake News!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Saveourcountry

Even insinuating or conceeding that there could have been collusion is a big mistake that just reinforces the narrative. It won’t shut up Schiff, Pelosi, and Schumer.


155 posted on 04/02/2017 9:28:06 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
She's done, what, maybe a whole two in-the-*flesh* lectures over the course of the past 5 months? The first was a month out from the election where she looked like death, while, in this second, resurrected evil, with a few odd satellite appearances betwixt. My guess is now that she has the luxuries of self pacing and unscrutinized cosmetic snd medical "touch ups," she can still handle the occassional gig, but obv not the marathon rigors of a Pres campaign or term...not that that will nrcessarily stop her from trying again...
156 posted on 04/02/2017 9:29:43 AM PDT by Moonlighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: kabar

My problem is what I heard today. It was all “get Trump all the time” by the drivebys with no evidence that Trump ever did any collusion with Putin which is insane anyway.


157 posted on 04/02/2017 9:32:51 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Home of the Free because of the brave.MAGA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

You gotta wonder....


158 posted on 04/02/2017 9:33:44 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Home of the Free because of the brave.MAGA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Moonlighter

You may well have the answer, the occasional appearance and that’s it.


159 posted on 04/02/2017 9:34:58 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Home of the Free because of the brave.MAGA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: kabar

You say, “Even insinuating or conceeding that there could have been collusion is a big mistake that just reinforces the narrative. It won’t shut up Schiff, Pelosi, and Schumer.”

Actually, if we asked these questions every time it was mentioned it *would* shut them up. I know this for a fact, and have tried it, and it works. (Especially when the conversation then turns to what Hillary and DNC did to Bernie that was exposed, that is still a raw spot for the dems that I argue with). I do not believe that by asking them to think about what they are spewing in any way insinuates or concedes that they are correct in their assumptions. It merely gets them to start thinking and shuts them up.


160 posted on 04/02/2017 9:36:47 AM PDT by Saveourcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-207 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson