Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar

You say: “There was no collusion. If there were, then it would be devastating with no real defense. Let’s stick to the actual allegations and not even give the hint that the Russian involvement served a useful purpose.”

Of course there was no collusion. That is not the point. They continue to rotely say this over and over. It is hard to show these idiots respect, I admit, but if you do show them the respect of making them think about what they are actually saying, it shuts them up. I have tried it over and over. It works. After they are unable to respond to what exactly was done to damage Hillary, it opens the door to make valid points that actually make sense.


152 posted on 04/02/2017 9:22:53 AM PDT by Saveourcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: Saveourcountry

Even insinuating or conceeding that there could have been collusion is a big mistake that just reinforces the narrative. It won’t shut up Schiff, Pelosi, and Schumer.


155 posted on 04/02/2017 9:28:06 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson