Check out # 259.
Posted on 03/25/2017 3:15:57 PM PDT by Hostage
Just listen!
I heard Alex Jones talking about this Friday. Will keep up on this.
Alex Jones is not welcome here, presumably for his Truther advocacy in the past. In my seldom viewing of his webcasts, he appears to be developing a more professional approach and to gaining better access to raw news before the alphabet soup outlets get their paws to mangle it.
What prompts me are successful lawsuits, competent law firms who thoroughly sift through evidence brought to them, because taking garbage evidence into court can get them sanctioned and damage their reputation.
The reason I am following this case is because Montgomery is now represented by Freedom Watch who has turned over copies of evidence to Comey and who has requested the matter be addressed by Congress member Nunes of the House Intel O/S Committee. FW is going to go public if Nunes continues to delay addressing it. That means a lawsuit and it may possibly mean the public has an opportunity to see some of the data. Numerous testimonies from separate sources point to massive numbers of felonies committed in the data.
If Alex Jones is carrying this story and you are following his presentation, please be kind to check that his sources are not based on rumor, unknown sources or the like. I’ll be happy to look into it to see if it checks out against the Freedom Watch developments.
Her entire show this evening was totally ‘off’ She talked a mile a minute, had one guest on where JJ seldom stopped long enough to let the guest speak. It seemed the guest was just a puppet sitting there for JJ prop. Not one word about anything seen here. Obamacare failure to repeal, Ryan’s Folly, and the two illegals raping the 14 yr in Maryland. The final segment JJ on the street asking who asking who is responsible for the ACA failure. The End. Perhaps tomorrow night, (Sun) this will be revealed or is Sun night a repeat of tonight? Some wires crossed somewhere.
This is quite a catch. Big poles and nets = STAT
that was concerning his analysis software, where the data he was supposed to analyze came from, THAT is the story
“She talked a mile a minute, had one guest on where JJ seldom stopped long enough to let the guest speak.”
Yeah, the woman from the Justice Department. I didn’t hear her say anything, and then she was gone!
She might have managed to get one sentence in, then JJ took off again.
Might be some good news regarding Judge N (his firing from FOX recently) Napolitano told friends he was on Trump’s Supreme Court shortlist
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/andrew-napolitano-supreme-court-shortlist-trump-236488
Be certain to check out this link
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3538066/posts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thYce7wAYyM&feature=youtu.be
He had Larry Klayman LIVE on his show!!!!!!
We are the only ones on the list on whom we can rely. It is up to us. The left will make this about Montgomery and whatever baggage he may or may not carry.
We cannot be drawn into any debate about Montgomery's credibility. Our focus needs to remain the evidence Montgomery brings to the table, Montgomery.
Anyone with 2nd hand smoke issues take precautions; sooner or later we will be gathering in the Smoky Backroom-- Freeper Research time for any background information which will validate his claims because short of a miracle based on the public's right to know, we will never be privy to 90% of the information he has gathered.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3538066/posts?page=1#1
Bookmarking.
Hopefully judge Janine will cover this story (tonight?)
I am no longer holding out for JJ to bring it on. We will hear more from George Webb as to what happened. He mentioned the JJ show would have it as coming from her Twitter feed. Maybe or maybe not, it doesn’t matter so much.
I rely on Larry Klayman and his law firm Freedom Watch. He has obtained immunity for Montgomery. The linked audio is still a good investment of time to know the raw backstory.
There are murder and blackmail involved, as well as massive illegal spying for political purposes, that’s my sense and why it might be that this story is being held back. I don’t believe it is conspiracy driven because many have seen the raw data (and there is immense corroboration of this), and Clapper/Brennan hired Montgomery back after they smeared him.
Klayman announced many things in a February 15, 2017 interview with FBN. Thanks to Whenifhow for the link:
https://youtu.be/qQcC7nivswc?t=38
One seemingly minor quote has to do with having evidence of NSA eavesdroppers joking and bragging how they listened in on their boyfriends, girlfriends to see if they were cheating and so forth. What that means in a microcosm of this entire case is that there are people that will testify that they indeed did have those conversations when they hear them if they haven’t already heard them. That in itself breaks this wide open. Because the unsophisticated and uninformed among us will identify strongly with listening for cheating on mates. That strikes home for most Americans, not because they cheat or have been cheated on, but because they understand it.
I’ve been following George Webb for quite a while now. He is virtually unknown, having very few views in most of his videos. He is driven by his previous conflict with McCabe. He knows the story of the century is the Awan brothers and that the media has had a blackout on it. He’s smart, he’s level-headed, he’s not prone to conspiracy thoughts, he verifies everything and travels to verify information. I think he’s vulnerable to a hit or a blackout from YouTube as a fake news uploader.
Stay tuned.
thanks! Your comments are very much appreciated!
SE Mom wrote:
“A man called George Webb does shows on youtube. He is the one who said Cameron would have this Montgomery story tonight on Judge Janine’s show. Then, for obscure reasons (at least to me) the president tweeted to watch her show tonight. Then it made the rounds on social media...”
Very interesting...
I wonder why the judge filled in something else instead of the Carl Cameron story on Montgomery?
Maybe there’s meetings coming up this week & more info will be coming from them?
InfoWars BROKE THIS FIRST, with Corsi, last Monday. Showed printouts of screenshots of the info. Said they also stole Sheriff Joe’s defense intel DURING his trial.
It doesn’t just rest on Montgomery’s say-so. Binney has also come forward and I’m blocking the name of the third guy with hard evidence.
InfoWars has first-class sources. When Alex goes off on a tear or rants about aliens, that’s one thing....schtick, entertainment. But when he has political info, his sources always check out, it just takes years, sometimes. AJ tends to put stuff out too soon, in some instances.
The smear job done on Montgomery is exactly what they do to people like Alex. Whenever that fails, they kill the messenger or witness.
The 1-hour-twenty-minute audio mentions *kills* more than once. Hoping they have evidence of whacks by the former administration.
I used to laugh at Alex Jones. Ignored him, But then, more and more of what he alleged was proven correct. To the point where I owe someone an apology IF AJ also turns out to be right about 9-11 being a false flag.
Stand back and take a look at how surreal this all is. If it was a political thriller, people would say it’s too far-fetched because we’ve been assured no conspiracy could be this far-reaching, right?
Right.
InfoWars BROKE THIS FIRST, with Corsi, last Monday. Showed printouts of screenshots of the info. Said they also stole Sheriff Joe’s defense intel DURING his trial.
It doesn’t just rest on Montgomery’s say-so. Binney has also come forward and I’m blocking the name of the third guy with hard evidence.
InfoWars has first-class sources. When Alex goes off on a tear or rants about aliens, that’s one thing....schtick, entertainment. But when he has political info, his sources always check out, it just takes years, sometimes. AJ tends to put stuff out too soon, in some instances.
The smear job done on Montgomery is exactly what they do to people like Alex. Whenever that fails, they kill the messenger or witness.
The 1-hour-twenty-minute audio mentions *kills* more than once. Hoping they have evidence of whacks by the former administration.
I used to laugh at Alex Jones. Ignored him, But then, more and more of what he alleged was proven correct. To the point where I owe someone an apology IF AJ also turns out to be right about 9-11 being a false flag.
Stand back and take a look at how surreal this all is. If it was a political thriller, people would say it’s too far-fetched because we’ve been assured no conspiracy could be this far-reaching, right?
Right.
Sorry for the repeat. Having probs w/FR today.
Judge Pirro didn’t expose anything last night about Montgomery. Tonight???
She did rip Ryan’s nads off last night; deservedly so. Ryan is a gutless RINO or RAT enabler, IMO.
no sense in getting too many balls in the air at once, better to rip Ryan one night and unleash Montgomery the next...
I tried to add most of those who expressed interest on what might have gone down yesterday evening with the JJ show not bringing on Cameron. It doesn’t really matter at this point as JJ is not part of this story but rather only one megaphone among many to come.
George Webb comments today that Montgomery wasn’t shown on JJ likely due to his prior history of bad check-writing coming out in the pre-show vetting:
https://youtu.be/QPjiLupOmgE?t=499
As I commented earlier, whatever Clapper/Brennan had on Montgomery only served to provide them a means of blackmailing him or otherwise controlling him. He had expertise in cyber hacking that they needed and any checkered material they had on him or framed him with only made them think he couldn’t run away too far.
It’s very similar to dirty probation officers using parolees to do things for them such as opening mail offsite (yes, that indeed happens). People that are caught up in criminal frame-ups are very hesitant to go against those holding their freedom.
Montgomery obviously had the expertise Clapper/Brennan wanted and needed otherwise they wouldn’t have hired him back.
IN ANY EVENT, Montgomery’s past has no bearing on the data. The sheer volume of the data along with recorded phone calls and all manner of other verifiable points of fact make Montgomery and his past irrelevant to the case. The people targeted and recorded in the data can vouch for its authenticity and as they are informed and they step forward to testify, the lawsuits will fly. Therefore, the distraction with Montgomery’s compromised past is nothing in the grander view of where this goes.
Where this goes is in the hands of a federal court where Freedom Watch has obtained immunity for Montgomery from federal judges. Copies of the data have been turned over to Comey and Freedom Watch is waiting on whether Nunes will call on Montgomery to testify. Nunes will likely think it too hot to handle as he does not appear to have the backbone to crawl under the fire that Montgomery is bad news even if this bad news was a frame-up. Nunes should realize that life is temporary and that in war you have to lay your life on the line. But I don’t think he has the right stuff. Any patriot would know that Montgomery is not the issue here. It is the data that is the issue.
IN ANY EVENT again, Freedom Watch has given Nune’s lawyers notice that they will go public with this, meaning a lawsuit will be filed. That means Nunes can either devote his current insignificant life to serving his country or dine with the establishment.
I’ll repeat an earlier comment made to a Fox segment with link provided by Whenifhow:
https://youtu.be/qQcC7nivswc?t=38
One seemingly minor quote has to do with having evidence of NSA eavesdroppers joking and bragging how they listened in on their boyfriends, girlfriends to see if they were cheating and so forth. What that means in a microcosm of this entire case is that there are people that will testify that they indeed did have those conversations when they hear them if they haven’t already heard them. That in itself breaks this wide open. Because the unsophisticated and uninformed among us will identify strongly with listening for cheating on mates. That strikes home for most Americans, not because they cheat or have been cheated on, but because they understand it.
Seemingly ‘’little’ things like this matter enormously in the popular culture.
Check out # 259.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.