And what happens when the majority of Londonstan revokes its consent?
“Well heck yeah. Someone might get their eye put out or something.”
Or even worse, get their feelings hurt.
And take a red marker and draw a red dotted line around your neck.
“In the rest of the United Kingdom, the majority of police officers do not carry firearms; that duty is instead carried out by specially-trained firearms officers. This originates from the formation of the Metropolitan Police Service in the 19th century, when police were not armed, partly to counter public fears and objections over armed enforcers as this had been previously seen due to the British Army maintaining order when needed.”
FOOLS!!!
It’s amazing that they can even recruit anyone to be a police officer unarmed.
The Brits have a small Army and most of the police are unarmed, seems the British Muslims could at least temporarily take by force the city of London and all government buildings?
These lib/commies just don’t quit. In Communist Brookline, where I live, there was a woman with a rainbow decal asking me to sign a petition making Massachusetts a sanctuary state. I replied, “are you not aware of what happened in London?” She left me without comment. Instead of admitting their gross error, they double down on it.
Halt! Or I’ll yell, Halt! again!
How does an unarmed man guard Parliament? Poorly I suppose.
One word: insanity.
I like this British civil society of unarmed police, but islam is a military threat.
He wasn't a security officer, he was a security monitor.
We note how stupendously effective this is...