Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hugin
Trump was all in on this.

Balderdash. Fake news.

If the President was "all in" on this, then why did he issue an ultimatum for the House, demanding a vote today or he'd "move on"?

If he was truly "all in", he would have convinced them to keep negotiating and drag things on, desperate to put a different shade of lipstick on this pig of a bill.

Instead the President saw the writing on the wall, cut his losses, and what is the immediate fallout? They're already calling for a change in leadership in the House at the top.

The President rightly recognized that sometimes it's better to walk away from a bad deal, and, for his trouble, there's also a good chance that he can remove the obstructionist saboteur Paul Ryan from the board. If he was "all in" he wouldn't have been willing to walk away, and he wouldn't have forced Ryan's hand.

The bashers never miss an opportunity to second-guess this President, who continues to think several moves ahead of such knee-jerk "analysis"...

40 posted on 03/24/2017 3:47:55 PM PDT by sargon ("If we were in the midst of a zombie apocalypse, the Left would protest for zombies' rights.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: sargon

Well-reasoned and -stated. Thanks.


46 posted on 03/24/2017 3:51:04 PM PDT by Hebrews 11:6 (Do you REALLY believe that (1) God IS, and (2) God IS GOOD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: sargon

>>If he was “all in” he wouldn’t have been willing to walk away, and he wouldn’t have forced Ryan’s hand.
****************************************************

Interesting point of view. I very much hope you are right.


49 posted on 03/24/2017 4:06:19 PM PDT by Kalamata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: sargon

I was wondering if Trump was setting up Ryan to make him Ryan look bad and get him out of the Speakership.


52 posted on 03/24/2017 4:09:34 PM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: sargon

Instead the President saw the writing on the wall, cut his losses, and what is the immediate fallout? They’re already calling for a change in leadership in the House at the top.


You can day dream all you want about Ryan but the immediate fall out here is that POTUS knows he can’t count on conservatives to support him. Good luck on Ryancare 2.0, spending, etc. POTUS will be looking for votes elsewhere in the future, guaranteed.


54 posted on 03/24/2017 4:14:06 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: sargon

“The President rightly recognized that sometimes it’s better to walk away from a bad deal, and, for his trouble, there’s also a good chance that he can remove the obstructionist saboteur Paul Ryan from the board. If he was “all in” he wouldn’t have been willing to walk away, and he wouldn’t have forced Ryan’s hand.”

Hope your right! Ryan is a huge impediment, that’s for sure.


73 posted on 03/24/2017 4:48:05 PM PDT by Trump_vs_Evil_Witch (career libs @ BIG BROTHER Inc.,..... President Trump says your FIRED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: sargon

The President rightly recognized that sometimes it’s better to walk away from a bad deal, and, for his trouble, there’s also a good chance that he can remove the obstructionist saboteur Paul Ryan from the board. If he was “all in” he wouldn’t have been willing to walk away, and he wouldn’t have forced Ryan’s hand.


Slam dunk. What the Bruins just couldn’t manage.


122 posted on 03/24/2017 9:11:47 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: sargon
If the President was "all in" on this, then why did he issue an ultimatum for the House, demanding a vote today or he'd "move on"?
If he was truly "all in", he would have convinced them to keep negotiating and drag things on, desperate to put a different shade of lipstick on this pig of a bill.
Instead the President saw the writing on the wall, cut his losses, and what is the immediate fallout? They're already calling for a change in leadership in the House at the top.

Personally, I think Trump set Ryan up to show the world how big of a putz and elitist/establishment Ryan is. Now, there's rumors of Ryan being replaced. It might have all worked out best for us, and the country!

Bring Obamicare back up, in the near future, and REPEAL it first! (Like they did seven or eight times before) Which makes one wonder: If they sent seven or eight repeals to Obama to be signed, only to be vetoed, why didn't they send the same damn thing to President Trump to be signed?!!!!!

145 posted on 03/25/2017 2:50:03 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson