Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Meet the New Boss

“He lied that Hillary didn’t have the “intent” to mishandle classified info..”

Notice no one asked him just how he knew what was Hillary’s intention. Disregarding the concept that intent doesn’t have anything to do with guilt.

Officer: “You were doing 55mph in a school zone.”

You: “Look officer, I certainly had no intent of violating the speed limit.”

Officer: “Sure, okay, drive more carefully. I apologize for stopping you. Have good day. Thank you.”


42 posted on 03/24/2017 9:07:48 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: odawg

Proving intent would have been easy.

She had over 1,000 instances of classified info on her server, over a period of four years.

For her not to have intent, the jury would have to believe that she didn’t recognize a single instance of those 1,000 classified messages as being a national secret.

Because if she realized even one instance of it was classified, and then KEPT ON doing what she was doing using her server, that demonstrates the intent to mishandle classified info.

We don’t even have to get into the question of whether she was negligent.


43 posted on 03/24/2017 9:11:19 AM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: odawg
Motive? Hillary provided that in this video taped quote:

As much as I’ve been investigated and all of that, you know, why would I —- I don’t even want -— why would I ever want to do e-mail?" she's seen on tape telling Peter Paul on home video captured at a fundraiser.

"Can you imagine?" she said.

YouTube video clip expounds the fact Hillary wanted to avoid oversight/prosecution for her 'work'

55 posted on 03/24/2017 9:40:22 AM PDT by wtd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson