Posted on 03/22/2017 10:15:34 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
If you perked up at news this week that President Trump's approval rating had dipped to 37 percent, according to figures tracked by Gallup, you should un-perk.
The truth is, whether Trump is in the 30s or 40s or even 20s or 50s simply doesn't matter much. For those of us between the ages of 25 and 100 years old, this is going to take some getting used to.
We are accustomed to believing that a president needs to be popular to see his agenda become law. Presidents from Woodrow Wilson to George W. Bush used their political capital, the democratic legitimacy that is uniquely their own in presidential systems like ours, to marshal public support for, say, the League of Nations or the Iraq War. "We must remember that it is the president who sets the agenda for our government," former Speaker John Boehner said on Election Night 2010, when Republicans won control of the House in a historic shellacking of President Obama.
President Trump no doubt sees himself in this vein, too. That's one of the reasons he enjoys public rallies in red states so much: Trump desperately wants to be a popular president in the traditional sense. But that is clearly not how our government is behaving right now. It is behaving more like a parliamentary democracy.
Indulge, if you a will, a brief detour into political science. During the implacable partisan gridlock of the Obama years, center-left writers like Matthew Yglesias revived an argument made by the late Juan J. Linz that presidential systems are uniquely given to constitutional crises. Unlike in parliamentary democracies, where prime ministers derive their authority from the legislature, a president of an opposing party may legitimately claim to represent the people as much as lawmakers themselves. The result? Destabilizing gridlock.
New York's Jonathan Chait, meanwhile, argued that America had historically handled such competing claims of legitimacy just fine until, that is, one of our two major parties was captured by a splinter group defined by an unusually virulent (from the point of view of other advanced democracies) strain of antigovernment ideology.
Without attempting to settle this question, let me introduce a new one: What if our system is mutating into a new hybrid of presidentialism and parliamentarism? Consider, in this light, Trump's meager approval rating not as a standalone public measure of his performance, but rather as a chunk of rock-solid support that he brings to the Republican Party. All of a sudden, it's not that his approval rating is only 37 percent it's that tens of millions of Americans a full 37 percent of the country! are lining up behind him.
To understand why this is more than statistical sleight of hand, let's dispense for a moment with the idea that there is a singular entity called the "Republican Party."
As my colleague Michael Brendan Dougherty writes, today's GOP is better seen as a union of various factions: tax-cutting fanatics like Paul Ryan, internationalist hawks like John McCain, "constitutional conservatives" like Rand Paul, and populist-nationalists like Stephen Bannon. These various strands of rightism last year reached an uneasy modus vivendi: We will deliver X-number of white working-class Democrats; in return you will downplay your commitment to free trade and cheap labor. You can have your tax cuts for the wealthy and possibly a Supreme Court majority to overturn Roe v. Wade.
In parliamentary lingo, when representatives from various parties strike such a bargain, it's called forming a government. The forging of such coalitions is hardly foreign to our presidential system. The difference is that such bargaining used to take place within and across our two major parties in concert as well as in tension with the executive branch of government. Before they went extinct, there were liberal northeastern Republicans and conservative southern Democrats; they would hold unruly and fractious national conventions in search of consensus presidential candidates. They would routinely create bipartisan legislative majorities on everything from civil rights to tax cuts to welfare reform.
Those days appear to be over. The variegated beast known as the Republican Party has formed a government and, as in a parliamentary system, it's the leaders of the winning party who have determined which priorities the government will pursue, and in what order. And because President Trump has thus far obediently behaved like a member of a parliamentary coalition, rather than an actor with his own agency and source of legitimacy, the leaders of the legislature report a "high level of satisfaction" with his administration. His tweeting, his executive-order photo-ops, his pissant job-rescue operations in Indiana and Michigan: They are but sound and fury next to the real, substantive action on Capitol Hill.
This could all blow up in their faces, of course. But if it does, it won't be due to Trump's unpopularity. It will be due to unbridgeable divisions within the Republican Party coalition. Unlike in parliamentary systems, however, neither Republicans, Democrats, nor the public at large can get rid of our head of state via "no confidence" or "loss of supply" parliamentary votes. We have to wait an interminable-seeming four years for that.
Rassmussen has him at 50 per cent....so “yawwwwwn”! Pick your favorite “Poll”oison!
WARPED
Oh, so these are the same polls that said Hillary was going to win the election. Riiiight!
Gallup sucked at polling that they don't do Presidential Election Polling anymore!
Last I checked Rasmussen who got the Election exactly right, they have TRUMP at 50℅
I'll trust Rasmussen
“... abysmal popularity rating...” ?
How on earth is anyone supposed to actually BELIEVE a statement like that coming from the SAME crowd of idiot and biased ‘news’ pseudo-professionals who said Trump would never be President??
Liberals are no longer in the WH... which means that the word games are over.
We now have a President who is positively addicted to truth and fixated on reality.
Americans welcome this as a wholesome and positive change.
Naturally, this is bad news for people like the Clinton’s because NOW, and for the first time in a long time.... it “IS what it IS”!
Because the poll numbers are manufactured propaganda!
Go take a poll in one of the two thousand rural counties in America, and you will find that our POTUS is still very popular, and that all than angst by liberal new media is just so much false noise.
For a while anyway.
They have plan B. Remove the sensors from the fences around the White House. Make sure most of them malfunction. Stop responding to the alarms since so many are false alarms. Let it be known that it's possible to wander around the grounds of the White House for 20 minutes and no one will bother you. Let it be known that you can jiggle the door handle of the White House and a sensor won't pick it up. Give the wet works guys floor plans of Trump Tower.
No need to release anyone who has earned jail time. Either kill the illegals or ship them to gitmo and we'll free up tons of space
There are some who are in jail because of outstanding fines. They have no money. They stay there because they can’t pay. Meanwhile, they are additionally charged for their incarceration and related costs, with penalties and interest. It’s sort of like a debtor’s prison. I say let these poor people go. Also, anyone convicted of an unconstitutional law should be released.
I like your ideas of what to do with the illegals : )
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.