"Before the "revolution", the Libyan government used oil revenues to subsidize a whole range of social benefits for its citizens." [Gee, must have been a swell place.]
"The U.S. and Europe are now having a panic attack because Islamic extremists no longer control two key oil ports in Libya." [It's not even on the American radar. I don't know anyone having a panic attack. You may.]
"And the notion that Washington cares at all about what "belongs" to the Libyan people is laughable." [Keep in mind this is KGB putin's propaganda organ talking about the present president of the United States, right?]
"The entire country belongs to the Libyan people." [This from the putinista press? They're constantly indifferent to their own people's short life span and to the idea of Russians or others owning their own fate under law. But you buy into this poppycock?]
Once again, absolutely nothing of substance...
You’re on the attack again.
Do you know what substance means?
Provide some articles talking about how good it is in Libya now. It could contain standard of living talk. It could contain business talk. It could contain talk of how much happier the people are. There are plenty of other indicators that get reported on when they are good. Find some and post something that conflicts with the article.
Prove it wrong, or at least raise the question with something of substance.