Once again, all you are doing is attacking FReepers.
If you have some information that counters the information in the article, I would appreciate knowing about it. I’m sure others would too.
Before Russia was involved in Libya, I said it was a mistake to get involved. When Obama, McCain, Clinton, Graham, (and I think Rubio too) were hawking the idea we should arm the Muslim Brotherhood, I thought it was a ridiculous idea.
Only later on did I find out that Soros money had funded the uprising in Tunisia, and his money was once again on the line in Libya.
Do you think Soros is a great supporter of U. S. strategic Global dynamics?
Khadaffy had been a bad play in the region in decades past. Pan Am 107 is a prime example. When Bush invaded Iraq, Khadaffy contacted the U. S. and turned over his nuclear weapons program. He saw the handwriting on the wall.
Egypt was so disgusted with the Muslim Brotherhood they tossed them out. They remain in Libya, and I don’t think the place is better off. I think it’s worse off, by a magnitude.
If you have something to counter that, by all means, I’d appreciate hearing about it.
The only information I have is what I read. I haven’t read anything supporting the idea Libya is better off today.
You need to get over this Putin thing. If the report is false, explain how it is. If you can’t, why are you feeling such a burden on this?
Is it your take that Obama, McCain, Clinton, Graham, and likely Rubio too, were right? Are we anti-U. S. and pro Russian of we don’t agree?
Were you for Kaddafy when he was killing Americans? How about Assad? How about Saddam?