Ummmmmm, not guilty?
1 posted on
03/21/2017 8:03:46 AM PDT by
Puppage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
To: Puppage
131 posted on
03/21/2017 11:24:19 AM PDT by
Pietro
To: onedoug
To: Puppage
To: Puppage
The guy was 17. I though age of convent was 16. Heck she looks 15.
149 posted on
03/21/2017 12:43:36 PM PDT by
napscoordinator
(Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
To: Puppage
Regardless of what the law may say 17 year olds are not children. Many are in the military. If too many act immaturely it is the fault of a society that coddles them.
156 posted on
03/21/2017 1:18:07 PM PDT by
Seruzawa
(I keel you Vorga feelthy.)
To: Puppage
I say fire her but do nothing else.
Call me crazy if you wish but I say a 17yr old should be able to decide to have sex or not with anyone.
162 posted on
03/21/2017 2:35:24 PM PDT by
Bobalu
( Healthcare - someone must pay. Who should it be, and how did they get that obligation?)
To: Puppage
Objection your honor. The sweater puppies cannot be introduced into evidence.
Might taint the jury.
5.56mm
164 posted on
03/21/2017 3:02:55 PM PDT by
M Kehoe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson