“Justice Scalia embraced a rigid view of our Constitution, a view blind to the equal dignity of LGBT people, and hostile to women’s reproductive rights, and a view that often refused to acknowledge the lingering laws and policies that perpetuate the racial divide.”
Fags, abortion and the race card.
The leftwing agenda.
Except that Scalia would have supported abortion if an abortion amendment was legitimately passed. He would have been personally opposed—I think—but he would have stood for the rule of law. As I understand it, he saw the US Constitution as a legal contract between the people and government. One doesn’t just change the terms of a contract without following the rules. To do otherwise—even if the cause is just—tears apart the legal framework that holds diverse people together in a civil society.
I would not trust Franken to read what has been written on public bathroom walls.
Looks like his MSM mediot buddies are pushing him as their last grasping hope in the 2020 election.
Can you imagine Trump debating this pos even if Franken has the questions before the debate.