Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna

True. Criminal law is the province of the States except on Federal reservations and in DC. And it does NOT provide that the states must allow and promote the murder of some particular class of persons.


41 posted on 03/19/2017 5:05:29 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: arthurus
And it does NOT provide that the states must allow and promote the murder of some particular class of persons.

Nor does the Constitution forbid it, either, which means that it is a power left to the States, or the People, respectively.

Every state has always had its own definitions for the permissible use of deadly force, and for determining when a person is no longer alive. Until 1974, every state also had its own definition of when a person began his life. That is the correct Constitutional position. Under our system, there is no other sensible legal entity with the authority to make that definition.

Claiming that the Federal Government has jurisdiction over forbidding abortions is every bit as ridiculous as claiming it has jurisdiction over permitting them.

It doesn't. It never did. The reasoning in Griswold v. Connecticut, is laughable and anti-Constitutional, and it is what made Roe inevitable.

59 posted on 03/19/2017 7:48:34 PM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson