Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

More judicial overreach. Have we reached critical mass yet?
1 posted on 03/16/2017 3:39:21 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: SoFloFreeper

These two burka wearing, Feral tyrants need to be arrested and thrown in jail. It’s time “judges” be required to run for office. They all have become politicians, make them be required to be elected by the American people.


65 posted on 03/16/2017 6:23:50 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (I tried being reasonable, I didn't like it. - Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Why are the leftist judges suddenly worried about religious discrimination...???
If it were up to them they would force Christians to give out abortatives and perform infanticide against their religious convictions...???
If you are a Christian you must bake a cake or get sued out of existence?


68 posted on 03/16/2017 6:44:11 AM PDT by Leep (Cyclops Network News (CNN). The Most Trusted Source Of Fake News.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Obama bussed refugees to locations throughout the states.
Trump should send them to MD, HI and WA.


69 posted on 03/16/2017 6:54:50 AM PDT by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Time to march this up to the Supremes for a slap down.


72 posted on 03/16/2017 7:24:49 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Time to close the visa processing departments for some routine ‘maintenance’. They all could probably use a good coat of slow drying paint applied by 4 or 5 of sloths. We should have them back at their desks in 7 or 8 months.


75 posted on 03/16/2017 7:34:48 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Why don’t conservative judges start doing this with the abortion issue. That would push it before the Supreme Court eventually.


76 posted on 03/16/2017 7:35:47 AM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent (EEe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Judge Theodore Chuang is another Barack Obama stooge and a democrat. Obama mentality is sweeping the democratic party.


77 posted on 03/16/2017 7:41:08 AM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent (EEe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

It’s more likely that appeals court reverses. If it’s on the same grounds as the HI stay, that should put the ban back in place.


78 posted on 03/16/2017 7:44:47 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

I’m going to say this until I’m blue in the face:

Congress needs to impeach judges and disband courts.

5.56mm


79 posted on 03/16/2017 7:47:54 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
We have just finished our long EIGHT year nightmare of Dicktatorship rule where NO ONE challenged anything that Dick did to America whether it was legal, illegal, constitutional, or unconstitutional, because he was the first Halfrican in the White House.

All of a sudden when the GOP comes to power we have to have everything put forward by the current GOP President challenged?

I think not - if I were Trump I would go to the marxist DNC-run media and issue the following pronouncement: GO AHEAD JUDICAL BRANCH AND CHALLENGE ALL YOU WANT. IT IS ARTICLE 2 THAT ENFORCED THE POLICIES, LAWS, AND CONSTITUTION IN AMERICA - NOT ARTICLE 3!!
82 posted on 03/16/2017 8:15:24 AM PDT by Cheerio (#44, The unknown President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
JUDGE MEETS WITH OBAMA IN HAWAII

This shadow government has GOT to be dismantled!

83 posted on 03/16/2017 8:15:59 AM PDT by luvie (Be still and know that I Am GOD.....Psalm 46:10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper; P-Marlowe

They’re not avoiding national security. They’re saying it is secondary to family visits, college hiring, foreign religious demographics, and campaign rhetoric.

I can’t imagine Anthony Kennedy buying this since he oversees the 9th circuit.

But TDS is strong in Washington DC.

However, if he does buy 2nd class status of national security, and if he’s the 5-4 swing vote, anyway, then they might as well give it to him now rather than later.

All that said, we really need to realize that the lower courts are not constitional mandates but are congressional creations. Congress needs to rein in the power of a district judge to set national policy. It should require a scotus approval for a lower court ruling to go national.


87 posted on 03/16/2017 8:44:25 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

both Obammy appointees,, Obviously , the Senate has been cut out of the loop, willingly or otherwise.. both never had a vote in the Senate to confirm them.. they were rubber stamped thru.. some opposition party ol’ Mitch runs , huh??


89 posted on 03/16/2017 9:41:56 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

So the judges are saying because these countries are majority muslim, the US cannot discriminate. So basically the United States cannot, ever, ban travel from any Muslim nation, no matter how dangerous? And not India - majority Hindu. I mean this is nuts. I’m sorry but didn’t Obama put a temporary ban on same said countries?


90 posted on 03/16/2017 10:17:48 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
Trump needs to site Art IV, Sec 4 of the Constitution as authorization and proceed with the protection order. The overriding issue in ANY federal action is the Constitution. Here, the Constitution MANDATES federal action to prevent invasion (illegal and dangerous immigration is invasion) (Art IV, Sec 4) and there is no constitutional provision that the action must be non-discriminatory.

Attempts to again restrain Trump’s new EO/invasion-protection order should be rebuffed because there is no genuine dispute of a material fact to restrain (no evidence the EO creates irreparable harm). If the EO is challenged in court on the merits, the judge would have a problem reconciling years of unconstitutional federal anti-discrimination law with the actual Constitution as written and originally understood and intended.

Of course, the Constitution validly trumps unconstitutional federal law. If Trump could get the case into a federal court with a just judge, he could win. If not, then the case could go up to the Supreme Court. If Trump’s nominee, Gorsuch, isn’t yet nominated, then four out of eight Justices could rule against the clear constitutional mandate at issue here. That would mean no decision in an evenly-divided court and, thus, the lower court ruling would stand. At that point we would have a clear constitutional crisis.

Constitutional Crisis and Gambit: Sooner or later, we must confront the massive, ongoing constitutional crisis in the federal courts which long ago went way off the constitutional rails and are basically in free-form with no apparent limitations. IMO, this is where Trump should throw down the gauntlet: call the Leftist judiciary bluff by notifying them of the reasons Trump is constitutionally mandated to take this action pursuant to Art VI, Sec 4 and why the courts have not shown a valid constitutionally-based reason for preventing his immigration EO. Then continue implementing the EO declaring the court’s ruling null and void.

This would be one branch, the executive, notifying the other, the judicial, with a constitutionally-based explanation why the action of the judicial branch is unconstitutional and, thus, null and void. Maybe include in the notice a time period for the judicial branch to correct their error but IMO the executive branch should continue with this constitutional EO/protection order for the safety of the nation at least until receiving a legitimate response from the judicial branch that would contain sound constitutionally-based reasoning. Trump should also notify Congress to correct THEIR error as well with appropriate legislation pursuant to Art VI, Sec 4. Maybe NOW is the time for this.

Trump’s rejecting the unconstitutional decision by the federal judiciary would almost certainly trigger a Congressional move to impeach Trump. Such a move would be without constitutional merit as Trump is the only party in this case trying to uphold the Constitution. What is the constitutional standard for impeachment? “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” (Art II, Sec 4). What is the constitutional standard for treason? “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort” (Art III, Sec 3, Cl 1). By constitutional standards, if anyone should be impeached, it should be these judges blocking Trump’s protection order.

The answer is Trump should take his case to the American People citing Article IV Section 4 of the Constitution MANDATING the feds PROTECT the U.S. from invasion. Trump should urge his fellow Americans to call their congressmen to support his efforts to protect the American People and ask Congress to fix the existing law or pass a new one pursuant to Article IV Section 4. It’s a gamble but sooner or later, this showdown needs to happen. Who knows if or when our politically-vacillating Congress will nominate Gorsuch and there’s also the possibility Gorsuch could turn Left at the Supreme Court stop light as so many others have before him. Maybe now is the time. Now or never. If Trump took his case to the American People like he did during his campaign, I think he would win.

It’s time We the American People stand up for OUR freedoms and protection, OUR Constitution, OUR country, and OUR President. Trump wants to constitutionally protect America from invasion which is the first duty of the Federal Government and invasion is exactly what illegal and dangerous immigration is. Let’s pray that God will again help America here. Let’s do what we can to help Trump win and continue to make America great again.

97 posted on 03/16/2017 3:36:08 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Instead of POTUS do we now have JOTUS.


98 posted on 03/16/2017 3:40:20 PM PDT by jetson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Their black robes will be stained with the blood of innocents due to their jaded political rulings.


99 posted on 03/16/2017 3:42:53 PM PDT by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

What it seems to come down to with these dopes is “Well, it’s not lawful because we know Trump is REALLY doing this because he’s a racist, nasty orange man who stopped a woman from breaking the glass ceiling and we hate him and all of his people and everything he stands for.”

You know... some deep-seated legal foundation like that.

Well, since they’re now judging Trump’s decision based on what he “feels”, how do they write away the fact that Obama originally came up with the list of countries? Was he a racist anti-Muslim bigot, too?


103 posted on 03/16/2017 6:09:44 PM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

If this type of judicial ruling stands then any district judge can stop our attacks again ISIS because they target Muslims. In short, this ruling has abolished the position of Commander in Chief and the Constitutional oath of the President to protect this country against enemies foreign and domestic. The powers of the Constitution are clear, but apparently matter not.


104 posted on 03/16/2017 6:49:13 PM PDT by Lagmeister ( false prophets shall rise, and shall show signs and wonders Mark 13:22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

A time for defiance finally comes.


111 posted on 03/17/2017 6:28:02 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson