To: xzins
This is pretty EXPLOSIVE, if it can be PROVEN.
To: LibFreeUSA
In response to your comment that "This is pretty explosive, if it can be proven.";
My dear sir, please be advised. We are all adults here. This is neither a elementary schoolyard, nor a judicial court. The President does not have to PROVE and Justify any of his actions. He is not playing politics as usual. This is not a media televised event.The President need only get the intel and do what he deems fit with it. He can choose to televise it like a typical politician or can do things behind the curtains. It is his call.
Indeed, Nothing has to be PROVEN. It just has to be ACTED UPON.
123 posted on
03/14/2017 4:53:52 PM PDT by
vannrox
(The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
To: LibFreeUSA; PghBaldy; Whenifhow; rodguy911; LucyT
If it becomes clear that no US agency spied on a US citizen, but spying did occur, there’s no need for proof — it’s self-evident that the source was outside the Federal government.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Just look up ‘Echelon’ for background info.
This is how the Echelon program had been functioning even during the Clinton years [probably a lot longer than that] — the ‘key word search’ system.
That was how ‘key word’ searches originated — to spy on people via Venona.
We signed ‘spy on each other’ treaties to bypass legal hassles.
If not England, it could have been Australia, Canada, or even a foreign speaking country.
131 posted on
03/15/2017 5:28:11 AM PDT by
Arthur Wildfire! March
(Progressive Trickle Up policy: reward cronies, punish everyone else. 'Stimulus' shell game.)
To: LibFreeUSA
This is pretty EXPLOSIVE, if it can be PROVEN. There will never be proof that will stand up in court. We are talking about our spooks here.
135 posted on
03/19/2017 1:01:16 AM PDT by
itsahoot
( The return of the Super Secret, Super Genius Plan of GW fame #136)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson