Another dead bully.
Too bad.
He finally met someone who’d stand up to him m
And my response to you was based upon that, which was a pretty definitive response concluding guilt, and I was questioning your logic in making that determination.
Now you are expanding to include a lot of ifs that were not present in your first post. According to another poster he was texting with the babysitter. I do not know if that is true or not. Now as you say we do not know the entire story, but knowing what is available my initial conclusion is that this ex police officer played a large role in this becoming more than it ever should have. A person lies dead for perhaps rudely texting, but that does not justify him being shot to death. Especially when I can find no evidence that presents a scenario of imminent danger to the ex police officer.
I'll bet he wishes he had just got up and relocated himself to another part of the theater. That was the appropriate response to take in the first place. Not create a confrontation because the person has made you mad.
[[Now Bob you said:
Another dead bully.
Too bad.
He finally met someone who’d stand up to him m]]
No sir i never said that- another poster did- I wouldn’t say anything like that
[[Now you are expanding to include a lot of ifs that were not present in your first post.]]
Like any objective person should if you want to get to the bottom of what actually happened- several people; have brought out very good points that bring into question what really went down- and that is how the process of discovery works
[[ A person lies dead for perhaps rudely texting, but that does not justify him being shot to death.]]
Noone is sayign beign shot for texting is justifiable- what we are saying is that it’s pretty clear that this was not just about texting- and it’s questionable at this point who the aggressor was-
I think you’ve mixed me up with another poster- I have been presenting questions concerning Both parties, not just one side- but the evidence coming out is raising doubt that the man with the gun was ‘definitely the aggressor’