[[He killed somebody for the sole crime of texting during the previews.]]
It’s not me that doesn’t understand the issue- As explained already This was not just about popcorn nor was it about just texting- there were a lot of dynamics going on that lead to what happened-
[[He’s a murderer.]]
He killed someone- it hasn’t been determined that he murdered anyone yet- there’s a big difference
[[He’s a jerk.]]
Noone is questioning that- but being a jerk does not automatically make one a murderer when someone dies at their hand- That’s why facts matter- That’s why it has to be determined in court WHO initiated contact or incited to violence- that’s why we have trials- because emotions don’t make for sound judgments-
Do you know what happened when he returned from the manager? Who started the argument back up? What was said? Or is it simply enough for you that one man is dead, one man had a gun- and was a hothead, and therefore must be guilty of murder?
We know the important part:
he
killed
a
man
armed
only
with
popcorn
It’s murder. Pretending that it isn’t is stupid. This thing is more open and shut than OJ.