To: TigerClaws
I thought British convention for dates is Day / Month / Year.
The sign date of the Supervisor of Obstetrics is US format (Month / Day / Year).
Also interesting is that the attending doctor signed after his supervisor. That could mean nothing, though.
Methinks this is fake.
17 posted on
03/09/2017 12:23:33 PM PST by
HombreSecreto
(The life of a repo man is always intense)
To: HombreSecreto
"Also interesting is that the attending doctor signed after his supervisor. That could mean nothing, though. Methinks this is fake."The attending doctor signed on 8/5/1961. Although the 5 looks like an 8, it has hard edges on top.
Minor detail.
To: HombreSecreto
In the text on the form it is day/month/year.
At the bottom it is month/day/year.
Weird.
96 posted on
03/09/2017 1:49:22 PM PST by
Churchillspirit
(9/11/2001 and 9/11/2012: NEVER FORGET.)
To: HombreSecreto
That black footprint is just plain RACIST!
100 posted on
03/09/2017 2:18:57 PM PST by
BatGuano
(You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
To: HombreSecreto
I thought British convention for dates is Day / Month / Year.Good point. Here is another version of a Kenyan birth certificate for BHO associated with the early researcher Orly Taitz, giving the British order of dates. It is ostensibly a birth registration document the following day after the birth.
Here is an unrelated 2012-2013 document showing the same British dating system:
109 posted on
03/09/2017 2:43:35 PM PST by
Albion Wilde
("We will be one people, under one God, saluting one American flag." --Donald Trump)
To: HombreSecreto
The sign date of the Supervisor of Obstetrics is US format (Month / Day / Year).Yup. All you'd need is other examples from the same time period to verify that.
165 posted on
03/09/2017 7:34:04 PM PST by
zeugma
(The Brownshirts have taken over American Universities.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson