Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Meet the New Boss
One of the first things the lawyers for both sides have to do in a criminal case is put together a list of all witnesses -- both REAL witnesses and POTENTIAL witnesses -- that they intend to call in the case, or reserve the right to call in the case.

If there is any evidence that Sessions' calls or e-mails are among those that were intercepted under the FISA warrant that is the subject of a criminal case, his name is going to appear on the witness list even if he never gets called to testify.

As soon as his name appears on the witness list, he cannot stay on the case unless he intends to argue that he is not a material witness in the case. There isn't a judge in the land who would agree with that argument. More importantly, he would come off looking very foolish and unprofessional simply by going to any great lengths to stay on the case.

37 posted on 03/04/2017 10:20:52 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

As I said before, I disagree that the substance of the calls intercepted and the various parties thereto would be considered relevant evidence for a prosecution of Obama and his team for the crimes I indicated for the reasons I gave.


38 posted on 03/04/2017 10:31:57 PM PST by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson