Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: itsahoot
itsahoot wrote: "<> Once they tap they get everything, what is seen cannot be unseen. They may not be able to use what they saw but it will lead them to some other source they can use." But if they could use the first wide-range one from June, then they wouldn't have asked for the narrower range one from October.
458 posted on 03/04/2017 6:26:24 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies ]


To: WildHighlander57
But if they could use the first wide-range one from June, then they wouldn't have asked for the narrower range one from October.

Actually I think I said they couldn't use it in court but they might find information which would lead them to other legally acquired information. That is why they would ask for a more narrow authorization, to prove what they already knew from the illegal tapp.

461 posted on 03/04/2017 6:38:28 PM PST by itsahoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson