Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WildHighlander57
But if they could use the first wide-range one from June, then they wouldn't have asked for the narrower range one from October.

Actually I think I said they couldn't use it in court but they might find information which would lead them to other legally acquired information. That is why they would ask for a more narrow authorization, to prove what they already knew from the illegal tapp.

461 posted on 03/04/2017 6:38:28 PM PST by itsahoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies ]


To: itsahoot

“but they might find information which would lead them to other legally acquired information.”

What’s worse is if the find info that can’t be used, they will leak it out to the MSM anyway....that’s just as bad. Hell they have already been leaking fake info!!

Trump needs to drop a bomb on all this!! End it!!


466 posted on 03/04/2017 6:55:47 PM PST by MaxistheBest (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson