The covert would not seem to apply here as SASC members are out saying that they have never met with Russians in the course of SASC business.
The question was what would he do if he found out the Trump campaign colluded with Russia.
His answer should have been that he’d respond accordingly based on the severity and scope of findings, up to/including recusing himself if appropriate. By instead saying that he wasn’t aware of any campaign reps having Russian relations, that he had had no relations and couldn’t answer the original question he, at best, gave fodder to the propagandaist (as was once said, perception is oft all that matters in politics).
Fortunately, he answered “no” in a confirmation questionnaire with a specific question as to if he had been in contact with Russians in regard to the 2016 campaign.
You clearly have no understanding of the SASC members internal rules. We are not talking covert, we are talking overt. The members, if they contact foreign contacts... must and do report it, if they want to stay on the committee that is.
You know what his “answer should have been”— how would that be possible, as if to advise a brilliant prosecuting attorney how to answer a question from a red diaper doper baby, square head MN liberal a-hole who stole his election by manipulating a vote recount through the “Secretary of State” program of George Soros. You should be able to look that up on your web link to your expenses submission for posting.
You need to be sharper (having started in 2008, conveniently— you working at the Kalorama address or are you offsite, tweeting ValJar?) to play this game.
This is a total dismantle of the “legacy” of liberation theology, neo-socialist, alinskyite deep state and administrative govt. tyranny at all levels. Sessions isn’t going to “recuse” himself, and this isn’t watergate 1968. The facts— the actual facts are known. The rest is just weasels positioning for some scraps of power. Cleaning the Augean Stables, the scum trough feeding so many.