You clearly have no understanding of the SASC members internal rules. We are not talking covert, we are talking overt. The members, if they contact foreign contacts... must and do report it, if they want to stay on the committee that is.
You know what his “answer should have been”— how would that be possible, as if to advise a brilliant prosecuting attorney how to answer a question from a red diaper doper baby, square head MN liberal a-hole who stole his election by manipulating a vote recount through the “Secretary of State” program of George Soros. You should be able to look that up on your web link to your expenses submission for posting.
You need to be sharper (having started in 2008, conveniently— you working at the Kalorama address or are you offsite, tweeting ValJar?) to play this game.
This is a total dismantle of the “legacy” of liberation theology, neo-socialist, alinskyite deep state and administrative govt. tyranny at all levels. Sessions isn’t going to “recuse” himself, and this isn’t watergate 1968. The facts— the actual facts are known. The rest is just weasels positioning for some scraps of power. Cleaning the Augean Stables, the scum trough feeding so many.
I’ve been in the game long enough to know more about Franken, the SASC, and the importance of words than you do about me apparently. If Sessions’ answer had simply addressed the question, that would be the end all of the issue (for now at least). As it is, we’re needlessly stuck in the middle...again. He’s the latest in a string of Trump affliates to make an avoidable gaffe. If you know you’re under attack, don’t give your proverbial enemy the ammo. That’s my point, no more, no less.